آسیب‌شناسی زنجیره‌های یکپارچة تولید گوشت مرغ: مطالعه‌ موردی در استان مازندران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار مؤسسه پژوهش‌های برنامه‌ریزی و اقتصاد کشاورزی، وزارت جهاد کشاورزی، تهران، ایران

2 دکتری توسعه کشاورزی، گروه مدیریت و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

چکیده

زنجیره‌های یکپارچة تولید گوشت مرغ در کشور نمونه‌ای از زنجیره‌های تأمین و ارزش عمودی هستند که حلقه‌های آن‌ها در یک ساختار با مدیریت واحد اداره می‌شوند. این زنجیره‌ها در هر یک از حلقه‌های خود با آسیب‌هایی مواجه‌اند که بر عملکرد آن‌ها اثرگذار است. این پژوهش با هدف آسیب‌شناسی زنجیره‌های یکپارچة تولید گوشت مرغ در استان مازندران اجرا شده است. بدین منظور، زنجیره‌های زربال، آفاق طیور و اجداد مازندران به شیوه­ کیفی بررسی شدند. داده‌های مورد نیاز با استفاده از تکنیک‌های مشاهدة غیرمشارکتی و مصاحبة نیمه‌ساختاریافته از ذی‌نفعان، مدیران و کنشگران این زنجیره‌ها (19 نفر) به­صورت هدفمند جمع‌آوری شد. در فرآیند تحلیل داده‌ها، ابتدا توصیفی از ساختار هر زنجیره ارائه شد و سپس کدگذاری و تفسیر نتایج با استفاده از تحلیل محتوای کیفی صورت گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که شرکت پشتیبانی امور دام با اتخاذ سیاست‏های ناکارآمد، بیشترین آسیب‌ها را برای زنجیره‌ها در پی داشته است. این سیاست‌ها سراسر زنجیره‌ها را در بر می‌گیرند و به‌طور منحصربه‌فردی حلقة بازار را هدف قرار می‌دهند. در واقع، اگرچه زنجیره­ها در در خصوص نهاده‌ها، قراردادهای همکاری و قوانین دچار چالش هستند، اما به­دلیل اتخاذ سیاست­های ناکارآمد توسط شرکت پشتیبانی امور دام در حلقه بازار با چالش جدی­تری مواجه­اند. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Problem Analysis the Integrated Chain of Poultry Meat Production: A Case Study Research in Mazandaran Province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mojtaba Palouj 1
  • Rasool Lavaei 2
1 Assistant professor in Agricultural Planning, Economic and Rural Development Research Institute (APERDRI), Tehran, Iran
2 Ph. D. Student in Agricultural Development, Department of Management and Agricultural Development, Faculty of Economics and Agricultural Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

   The integrated chains of meat production in Iran are an example of vertical supply and value chains that all of their stages are managed in centralized structure. These supply and value chains in each of their stages face challenges that affect their performance. This study amid to problem analysis the integrated value chains related to poultry production in Mazandaran. So, Zarbal, Afagh Toyoor and Ajdade Mazandran value chains were studied using a qualitative method. Data were collected using non-participant observation and semi-structured interview techniques from stakeholders, managers and actors in mentioned chains (19 participants). In the process of data analysis, at first, a description was presented about structure of each chain and then, using qualitative content analysis, coding and results interpretation were considered. Findings revealed that State Livestock Affairs Logistics (SLAL) has caused the most damage to the value chains by adopting inefficient policies and inappropriate behaviors. The importance of these policies is that they cover across the chains and specifically affect the market. Indeed, although these chains are faced with challenges in terms of inputs, collaboration agreements, and laws, they are facing more serious challenges due to the ineffective policies adopted by SLAL in the market.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Integrated Production Chains
  • pathology
  • Poultry Meat

مراجع

  1. Ariffin, A., & Abas, Z. (2015). Literature ratified knowledge based view of poultry supply chain integration concept.  Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 77(27), 35–39. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/757b/8846df29ebab7a0d36fe0a82082a754e3f2d.pdf
  2. Afagh Toyoor Company (ATC). (2018,   July  6). Individual Interview: The Structural and Challenges of Afagh Toyoor Company. Unpublished.
  3. Barari, A. (2011). Analysis of Marketing Structure of Iranian Agricultural Products, Case Study of Chicken Products. Agricultural Economics and Development, 19(75), 163–184. (In Farsi).
  4. Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14.
  5. Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.
  6. Burns, R. B. (2000). Introduction to Research Methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  7. Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2001). Supply chain management. Strategy, planning & operation. New Jersey, U.S: Prentice Hall. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-8349-9320-5_22.pdf
  8. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  9. Deputy of Livestock of Mazandaran Province (DLMP). (2018). Integrated Chain of Chicken Meat Production Statistics. Unpublished. (In Farsi).

10. Delangizan, S & Jashn Porookani, Kh. (2017). Investigation of Kermanshah Poultry Industry Supply chain: Determining the missing stages, the economic size of each stage and designing. Supply Chain Management Journal. 19(58). 29-39. (In Farsi).

11. Dizyee, K., Baker, D., & Rich, K. M. (2017). A quantitative value chain analysis of policy options for the beef sector in Botswana. Agricultural Systems, 156, 13–24. Retrieved from

12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X16306126

13. Donovan, J., Franzel, S., Cunha, M., Gyau, A., & Mithöfer, D. (2015). Guides for value chain development: a comparative review. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 5(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-07-2013-0025

14. Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 93–99.

15. Feller, A., Shunk, D., & Callarman, T. (2006). Value chains versus supply chains. BP Trends, 1–7.

16. Ghasemi, I., Mohammadi Gharehghani, M. A., Lavaei Adaryani, R., Noorbakhsh Jafari, S. A., Asad Abadi, E., & Pirasteh, B. (2018). Analysis the villages’ perceptions about residential displacement consequences: a critical ethnography study in Sorkhe Gav village, Heris county. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 49–2(3), 527–544. (In Farsi).

17. Hancock, D., & Algozzine, B. (2016). Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=9DfwDQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Doing+Case+Study+Research&ots=n3EyeOiAJM&sig=_ZuZ4oaKsBK0CQCvU9HWZm_qk7I

18. Hancock, D. R., & Algozzine, B. (2016). Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers. Teachers College Press.

19. Heydari, J., Zreiyan Khosro Mazrae, R., Heydari, E., Hezarkhani, B., & Karimi, R. (2019). Modeling the Factors Affecting on Price Fluctuations in the Chicken Meat Supply Chain: A System Dynamics Approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research. 12(2). 237-262. (In Farsi).

20. Jafari. M. (2018, August  6). Individual Interview: The Structural and Challenges of Zarbal Company. Unpublished. (In Farsi).

21. Jiran, A., & Palouj, M. (2016). Modern structure poultry industry in Iran. Tehran: APERDRI.

22. Kline, C. S., Joyner, L. E., Kirchoff, J. F., Crawford, A., Jilcott Pitts, S., Wall-Bassett, E., Dunning, R. (2016). Gaps and barriers along the North Carolina agri-food value chain. British Food Journal, 118(2), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2015-0223

23. Kohlbacher, F. (2006). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1), 1–30.

24. Kotni, V. V. D. P. (2016). Value Chain Management in Marine Fisheries: A Case Study of Andhra Pradesh. Aircconline.Com, 7(2), 9–19. Retrieved from http://aircconline.com/ijmvsc/V7N2/7216ijmvsc02.pdf

25. Lavaei Adaryani, R., Kalantari, K., Asadi, A., & Alambeigi, A. (2019). Content Analysis of Business Cooperatives Theories Emphasizing Network Functions. Journal of Business Mangement, 11(1), 3–24. (In Farsi).

26. Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0002204

27. Miller, C., & Jones, L. (2010). Agricultural value chain finance: Tools and lessons. Retrieved from http://www.new-ag.info/10/05/dl/books.rtf

28. Perez, C., de Castro, R., & Font i Furnols, M. (2009). The pork industry: a supply chain perspective. British Food Journal, 111(3), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700910941462

29. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing research: Principles and methods. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

30. Ramsay, J. (2005). The real meaning of value in trading relationships. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(2), 549–565.

31. Richards, L., & Morse, J. M. (2012). Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods. Sage.

32. Sarhangpoor, H, (2018, August  15). Individual Interview: The Structural and Challenges of Ajdad Mazandran Company. Unpublished. (In Farsi).

33. Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage Publications.

34. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

35. TahamiPoor, M. (2011). Analyzing Meat Chicken Price Behavior in Iran. Agricultural Economics and Development, 19(75), 241–262. (In Farsi).

36. van Roekel, J., Willems, S., & Boselie, D. M. (2002). Agri-supply Chain Management to Stimulate Cross-border Trade in Developing Countries and Emerging Economies.

37. Yin, R. K. (2015). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.

Zanjani, A., & Karimi, S. M. (2015). Facrors affecting poultry of vertical integration of the poultry indstry. Case study: City of Surrey. Animal Science Journal, 109, 163–174. (In Farsi)

تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران
دوره 51، شماره 3
مهر 1399
صفحه 531-550

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار