10. Elahi, Sh., Abdi, B., & DanaeeFard, H. (2010). E-government adoption in Iran: Explanation of the individual, organizational and social variables’ role in technology acceptance, Journal of Public Administration Perspective, 1, 41-67(In Farsi).
11. Emadi, M. (2005). The role of information and communication technology in accelerating agricultural development process. Jihad, 25 (269): 54-64.
12. Fornell, C., & Larcker D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 39–50.
13. Gefen, D. Straub, D. W. & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Communications of the AIS, 4 (7), 1–78.
14. Hofkin, N. & Tagart, N. (2004). An analysis of gender and information and communication technology in Developing Countries. Translated by Shabanali Fami, H. & Alibeygi, A. Alzahra University Press, Tehran. (In Farsi).
15. Huey-Pyng Shyu, S. & Huang, J. (2011). Elucidating usage of e-government learning: A perspective of the extended technology acceptance model. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 491-502.
16. Igbaria, M. & Iivari, J. (1995). The Effects of Self-efficacy on Computer Usage. Omega international Journal management science, 23(6), 587-605.
17. Jalali, A., Rowhani, S. & Zare, M. (2006). E-villages. Iran University of Science and Technology Press. Tehran. (In Farsi).
18. Kalantari, Kh. (2009). Structural Equation Modeling in Socio-Economics Research, Publications of farhange saba, Tehran (In Farsi).
19. Kim, T. G., Hyoung Lee, J. & Law, R. (2008). An empirical examination of the acceptance behaviour of hotel front office systems: An extended technology acceptance model. Tourism Management, 29, 500-513.
20. King, W. R.,& He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technologyacceptance model, Information & Management, 43, 740-755.
21. Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A. and Larsen, K. R.T. (2003). The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems,12(50), 752-780.
22. Mohd Suki, N, & Ramayah, T. (2010). User Acceptance of the E-Government Services in Malaysia: Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 5, 395-413.
23. Mooghali A, Talebi S, & Seif M. (2011). Contributing Factors to the Attitudes Toward Using Informationand Communication Technology(ICT)Among Students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, School of Management. SDME. 8 (1), 33-40 (In Farsi).
24. Nasiri Zang-Abad, A. (2007). The acceptance of the new technologies in organizations. Tadbir, 182: 49-53.
25. Park, S. Y. (2009). An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students' Behavioral Intentionto Use e-Learning. Educational Technology and Society, 12 (3), 150–162.
26. Patten,M. L. (2002).Proposing Empirical Research. LosAngeles: Pyrczak Publishing.
27. Raykov, T. (1998). CoefficientAlphaandCompositeReliabilitywithInterrelatedNonhomogeneous Items. Applied PsychologicalMeasurement, 22(4), 375-385.
28. Reid, M., & Levy, Y. (2008). Integrating Trust and Computer Self-Efficacy with TAM: An Empirical Assessment of Customers’ Acceptance of Banking Information Systems (BIS) in Jamaica. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 12(3), 1-18.
29. Rezaei, M. (2009). Prevailing theories about information and communication technology acceptance. Quarterly Journal ofCommunication Researches, 16 (4): 63-93. (In Farsi).
30. Riahi vafa, A. and Hedayati, M. (2006). Ranking of Tehran province villages in terms of transferring post offices to information and communication technology offices using numerical taxonomy. Village and Development (Roosta-Towse-e), 9 (4): 1-36. (In Farsi).
31. Sarlak, M., Montazer, R. and Habibi, F. (2008). Evaluation of the effects of cultural differences on using information and communication in a cultural multimedia environment. Tomorrow Management, 20: 46-56. (In Farsi).
32. Tavakol, M. & Ghazinouri Naeini, R. (2010). Diffusion and Obstacles to ICT Adoption in Iranian Industries; Case Study of Selected Sectors, Science & Technology Policy, 3(3), 31-48 (In Farsi).
33. Tavousi, M., Hidarnia, A.R., Montazeri, A., Taremian, F. & hajizadeh, E. (2010). Modification of Reasoned Action Theory and comparison with the original version by path analysis for substance abuse prevention among adolescents, Magazine of medicine Hormozgan, 14(1), 45-54 (In Farsi).
34. The Governor of Kohgilouyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province. (2012). The introduction of Kohgilouyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province. Retrieved January 1 2012, from: http://www.ostan-kb.ir. (In Farsi).
35. Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2011). An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 57, 1645-1653.
36. Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters S., & Budgen, D. ( 2010). Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use?Asystematic literature review, Information and Software Technology, 52, 463-479.
37. Venkatesh, V. Michael G. M., Davis, G. B. & Davis, F. D. (2003). UserAcceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View, Journal of Management Information System Quarterly, 27)3), 425-478.
38. Yi, M. Y. & Yujong, H. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 431-449.
39. Zampetakis, L. A. & Vassilis, M. (2006). Linking creativity with entrepreneurial intentions: A structural approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(3), 413-428.
Zumbo, B. D, Gadermann, A. M, & Zeisser, C. (2007). OrdinalVersions of Coefficients Alpha and Theta for Likert Rating Scales.Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6, 21-29.