مدل داده بنیاد توسعه پایدار روستائی مبتنی بر نهادگرایی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

در طول فرآیند گذار توسعه، سیاست‌گذاران معمولاً تمرکز زیادی بر وضعیت و توسعه بیشتر محیط رسمی نهادی دارند، از این‌رو، قوانین و مقررات را متناسب با شرایط تطبیق و اتخاذ می‌کنند. فقدان نهادهای هماهنگ کننده و کانال‌های ارتباطی ناکارآمد، فقدان همکاری نهادینه شده بین سازمان‌های دولتی، و همچنین بین دولت و سایر بازیگران مختلف بخش خصوصی به عنوان یک خلأ رسمی ناشی از پراکندگی شدید بخش‌های مدیریت دولتی می‌‌باشد. خلأهای سازمانی غیررسمی مختلف مربوط به استفاده از منابع سنتی است که در آن تغییر شیوه‌های موجود در تولید کشاورزی و مشارکت در فعالیت‌های محلی برای مردم روستا دشوار است بدین ترتیب تأثیر خلأهای نهادی به ویژه در محیط‌های سازمانی ناپایدار مشهود است. این خلاء‌ها نیاز به ساختار نهادی کارآمد بین کارگزاران دولتی و اجتماعات روستایی برای ایجاد تمایل به همکاری و مشارکت در امور توسعه روستایی دارد.
از این‌رو هدف پژوهش تعیین ابعاد نهادگرایی در توسعه روستایی و در صدد طراحی و تبیین مدل‌ توسعه پایدار روستایی مبتنی بر نهادگرایی در کشور می‌باشد.
جهت‌گیری اصلی پژوهش بنیادی و کاربردی بود. روش پژوهش کیفی با رویکرد استقرایی (اکتشاف مدل) و از استراتژی نظریه داده بنیاد (گراندد تئوری) استفاده شده است. ابزار جمع‌آوری اطلاعات مصاحبه عمیق نیمه ساختاریافته با نمونه‌گیری غیراحتمالی هدفمند با بیست نفر به صورت اشباع نظری از خبرگان گروه سیاست-گذاری و خط‌مشی‌گذاری عمومی برخوردار از ویژگی خبرگی علمی و اجرایی بود.
در این پژوهش مدل پارادایمی توسعه پایدار روستایی در نقش‌های شرایط علّی، زمینه‌ای، شرایط مداخله‌گر، مقوله محوری، راهبرد و پیامدها طراحی و تدوین و ابعاد نهادینگی، مبانی خرُد نهادگرایی، مبانی کلان نهادگرایی، فرآیند نهادگرایی در روستا طی راهبرد نهادگرایی یکپارچه و پیامدهای نهادینه‌سازی پایداری در روستا شامل پایداری قانونی- اداری، پایداری فرهنگی- اجتماعی، پایداری اکولوژیکی- کالبدی و پایداری اقتصادی- صنعتی شناسایی گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


Extended Abstract

During the development transition process, policy makers usually focus a lot on the status and further development of the formal institutional environment, hence, adapt laws and regulations according to the conditions. The lack of coordinating institutions and inefficient communication channels, the lack of institutionalized cooperation between government agencies, as well as between the government and other different private sector actors is a formal vacuum resulting from the severe fragmentation of public administration departments. Various informal organizational gaps are related to the use of traditional resources, in which it is difficult for rural people to change existing methods in agricultural production and participate in local activities, thus the effect of institutional gaps is evident, especially in unstable organizational environments. These gaps require an efficient institutional structure between government agents and rural communities to create a willingness to cooperate and participate in rural development affairs. Therefore, the aim of the research is to determine the dimensions of institutionalism in rural development and to design and explain the model of sustainable rural development based on institutionalism in the country.

In this research, with a more detailed examination of the literature and theories of rural development, new theories and models of sustainability and institutionalism were used, which include other dimensions of rural development. Based on this, the main assumptions of these two approaches can be placed as the theoretical basis of this research. Considering that new dimensions in this research in the field of rural development; Statistics are discussed. Based on the theoretical foundations and approaches and approaches and previous researches, and considering the gap of existing and informal institutional studies in this field, we can enter the scope of institutionalism in the field of rural development and consider it from the perspective of new institutionalism. Studied. In general, the argument is that the institutional arrangements of rural development are an obstacle for the crystallization of the place of the village in the development of the country, and it is expected that with the feature of  institutionalism and the final achievement of this research, more effective institutional arrangements in the matter of rural development will be made in the policy making of country development should be institutionalized. Therefore, conducting research in the direction of the story of institutionalism in sustainable rural development by asking two main questions: 1. What are the dimensions of sustainable rural development based on institutionalism? 2. What is the model of sustainable rural development based on institutionalism? it became necessary

The main direction of the research was fundamental and applied. Qualitative research method with inductive approach (model exploration) and grounded theory strategy has been used. The data collection tool was a semi-structured in-depth interview with targeted non-probability sampling with twenty people in the form of theoretical saturation from the experts of the policy and public policy group, having the characteristic of scientific and executive expertise.

The research results lead to some notes related to the existing knowledge. In addition to the micro foundations factors, factors such as causal conditions and core categories affecting this process have been investigated. More effective platform builders in the implementation of integrated institutional strategy in the village was a significant advantage of the research. Also, the effective elements in the process of institutionalization and a comprehensive view on the institutionalization of sustainability in the new experimental contexts of integrated institutionalization in the village were explained by presenting a comprehensive and more efficient model. This study argues that the existing institutional procedures are an obstacle to the effective fulfillment of the organizations' tasks and has proposed a new institutional model to improve the rural institutional functioning. The findings, while confirming the previous models of sustainable rural development, presented a new combination with new components and opened new Valves of the concept of institutionalism in the field of sustainable rural development.

In this research, the paradigmatic model of sustainable rural development in the roles of causal conditions, contextual conditions, intervening conditions, core category, strategy and consequences of design and formulation, and institutional dimensions, micro-fundamentals of institutionalism, macro-fundamentals of institutionalism, the process of institutionalization in the village during the strategy of integrated institutionalism and The consequences of institutionalizing sustainability in the village include legal-administrative sustainability, cultural-social sustainability, ecological-physical sustainability and economic-industrial sustainability identified.

پازکی، معصومه و صمدی مقدم، شیرین(1399). تحلیل نقش مدیریت مبتنی بر حکمروایی خوب در توسعه پایدار روستایی (مورد مطالعه: دهستان فیلستان، شهرستان پاکدشت). فصلنامه جغرافیا و توسعه، شماره 58، صص 112-93.
پالوج، مجتبی(۱۳۹۸). نسبت الگوی اسلامی - ایرانی پیشرفت و توسعه پایدار روستایی، برنامه­ریزی و آمایش فضا، دوره، ۲۳، ویژه نامه بهار، صص 168-145.
خنیفر، حسین و مسلمی، ناهید(1398). اصول و مبانی روش­های پژوهش کیفی، جلد اول؛ رویکردی نو و کاربردی، چاپ چهارم، انتشارات نگاه دانش، تهران.
دانایی­فرد، حسن؛ الوانی، سیّدمهدی و آذر، عادل(1383). روش­شناسی پژوهش کیفی در مدیریت: رویکردی جامع. انتشارات صفار، تهران.
 
Abreu, I., Nunes, J.M., Mesias, F.J.,(2019). Can rural development Be measured? Design and application of a synthetic index to Portuguese municipalities. Soc. Indicat. Res. 145, 1107–1123.
Amininejhad, G., Zendehboodi, Y. (2019). Assessing the Indicators of Rural Sustainable Development in Bushehr Province of Iran: A Case Study of Tangestan County. Village and Development, 21(4), 1-28. (In Persian)
Chen, Z. (2022). Process institutionalism: toward an action-centric approach to state extraction. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 9(1), 4.
Danai Fard, Hassan; Alwani, Seyedmehdi and Azar, Adel. (2004). Qualitative research methodology in management: a comprehensive approach. Tehran: Safar Publications. (inPersian)
Dobšinská, Z., Šálka, J., Sarvašová, Z., & Lásková, J. (2013). Rural development policy in the context of actor-centred institutionalism. Journal of Forest science, 59(1), 34-40.
Eldesouky, A., Mesias, F., (2014). An insight into the influence of packaging and presentation format on consumer purchasing attitudes towards cheese: a qualitative study. Spanish J. Agric. Res. 12, 305–312.
Glückler, J., Punstein, A. M., Wuttke, C., & Kirchner, P. (2020). The ‘hourglass’ model: An institutional morphology of rural industrialism in Baden-Württemberg. European Planning Studies, 28(8), 1554-1574.
Hamzah, Isa (2010). Effective Institutional Arrangement in Rural Development: Malaysia. MLitt(R) thesis.
Horlings, L. G., & Kanemasu, Y. (2015). Sustainable development and policies in rural regions; insights from the Shetland Islands. Land Use Policy, 49, 310-321.
Karimi, F., Ahmadvand, M. (2014). Status Assessment and Prioritization of Indicators for Sustainable Development in Rural Areas (The Case of Central District of Boyer-Ahmad County). Journal of Rural Research, 5(3), 663-690. (In Persian).
Kaufman, B.E. (2003). The organization of economic activity: insights from the institutional theory of John R. Commons. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. Vol. 52, pp 71-96.
Khanifar, Hossein and Muslimi, Nahid. (2019). Principles and basics of qualitative research methods, first volume; A new and practical approach, fourth edition, Negah Danesh Publications. (inPersian)
Kostov, P. and Lingard, J. (2003). Risk Management: a general framework for rural development. Journal of Rural Studies. Vol. 19. pp 463- 76.
Palmer, D., Biggart, N., & Dick, B. (2008). Is the new institutionalism a theory. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism, 739-768.
Paloj, Mojtabi. (2019). The ratio of the Islamic-Iranian model of progress and sustainable rural development in planning and spatial planning, period, 23, spring special issue, pp. 145-168.(inPersian)
Pazaki, Masoumeh and Samadi Moghadam, Shirin. (2020). Analysis of the role of management based on good governance in sustainable rural development (case study: Filistan village, Pakdasht city). Geography and Development Quarterly, No. 58, pp. 93-112. (inPersian)
Pike, A., Marlow, D., McCarthy, A., O’Brien, P., & Tomaney, J. (2015). Local institutions and local economic development: The local enterprise partnerships in England, 2010. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8, 185–204.
RUSU, R. C. V., NECULIȚĂ, M., CRISTEA, D., MOGODAN, A., PETREA, Ș., & SIMIONOV, I. (2020). Sustainable development of rural areas of South-East Region of Romania. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 20(2).
Scott,W. (2005). Institutional Theory: Contributing to a Theoretical Research Program. In Great minds in management: The process of theory development; Smith, K., Hitt, M., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 460–484.
Shcherbak, V., Ganushchak-Yefimenko, L., Nifatova, O., Fastovets, N., Plysenko, H., Lutay, L., & Ptashchenko, O. (2020). Use of key indicators to monitor sustainable development of rural areas. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 6(2), 175-190.
Strauss A.L & Corbin J. M. (2008). Basic of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.     
Webb, J.W.; Khoury, T.A.; Hitt, M.A. (2019).The influence of formal and informal Institutional voids on entrepreneurship. Entrep. Theory Pract.
World Bank, (2021). Expanding the Measure of Wealth. Indicators of Environmentally Sustainable Development. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Živojinović, I., Ludvig, A., & Hogl, K. (2019). Social innovation to sustain rural communities: Overcoming institutional challenges in Serbia. Sustainability, 11(24), 7248.