واکاوی ادراک روستاییان از پیامدهای جابه‌جایی سکونتگاهی: مطالعه‌ای قوم‌نگارانه در روستای سرخه‌گاو، شهرستان هریس

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات اجتماعی جهاد دانشگاهی

2 عضو هیأت علمی مرکز تحقیقات مدیریت رفاه اجتماعی، دانشگاه علوم بهزیستی و توان‌بخشی، تهران، تهران، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری گروه مدیریت و توسعه، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

4 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد رشته جنگلداری، گروه جنگلداری، دانشکده منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

5 دانشجوی دکتری توسعه کشاورزیت، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

6 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد و پژوهشگر مهندسین مشاور طرح و منظر تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

جابه‌جایی سکونتگاهی پدیده­ای است که ابعاد مختلف زندگی انسان را تحت‌تأثیر قرار می­دهد و دارای پیامدهای چند بعدی و گاه پیچیده است. شناسایی چنین پیامدهایی می­تواند نقش چشمگیری در برنامه­ریزی و هدایت فرآیندهای جابه‌جایی داشته باشد. در این راستا، پژوهش حاضر با هدف اصلی واکاوی ادراک اهالی روستای سرخه‌گاو از پیامدهای جابه‌جایی سکونتگاهی انجام شد. طرح پژوهش با استفاده از رویکرد قوم­نگاری انتقادی هدایت شد. مشارکت­کنندگان شامل تمامی اهالی روستای سرخه‌گاو بودند که تجارب مشترکی در خصوص جابه‌جایی سکونتگاهی داشتند. جمع­آوری داده­ها با استفاده از مصاحبه نیمه­ساختار یافته، درخت مشکل، مشاهده و نقشه­های اجتماعی صورت گرفت. انتخاب مشارکت­کنندگان به­صورت کاملاً هدفمند انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که فوریت فرآیند جابه‌جایی در روستای سرخه‌گاو منجر به نادیده گرفتن فرآیندهای برنامه­ریزی مشارکتی شده و بدین ترتیب برخی از ملاحظات کالبدی خانه‌ها در انطباق با شرایط جوی و اجتماعی مد نظر قرار نگرفته است. یافته­ها نشان می­دهد که دیدگاه فنی صرف در خصوص فرآیند جابه‌جایی روستای سرخه‌گاو نه تنها سبب بروز پیامدهای نامطلوب کالبدی و اجتماعی شده؛ بلکه برخی از پیامدهای مثبت جابه‌جایی نظیر استحکام خانه‌ها را کم اهمیت جلوه داده است. به­طور کلی، شواهد نشان داد که پیامدهای اجتماعی-اقتصادی جابه‌جایی سکونتگاهی در روستای سرخه‌گاو به­طور فزاینده­ای از پیامدهای کالبدی نشأت می­گیرد. زیرا ساختارهای کالبدی با مناسبات اجتماعی، اقتصادی و اقلیمی منطقه تطابق چندانی نداشته و تجارب پیشین ساکنین را برنمی­تابد. 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis the villages’ perceptions about residential displacement consequences: a critical ethnography study in Sorkhe Gav village, Heris county

نویسندگان [English]

  • Iraj Ghasemi 1
  • mohammad ali Mohammadi gharehghani 2
  • Rasool Lavaei Adaryani 3
  • Seyed Alireza Noorbakhsh Jafari 4
  • Ehsan Asad Abadi 5
  • Banafsheh Pirasteh 6
1 Assistant Professor in Institute of Humanity and Social Science ACECR
2 social welfare management research center- university of social welfare and rehabilitation sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Ph. D. Student of Agricultural Development, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
4 Ms. C Student of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
5 Ph. D. Student of Agricultural Development, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
6 Graduate MSc. and Researcher at the Tarho Manzar Consultant Engs,Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The residential displacement is considered as a phenomenon that affects the various dimensions of human life and has multi-dimensional and sometimes complex consequences. Identifying such consequences can play an important role in the planning and conduction of displacement processes. In this regard, the present study was conducted with the main purpose of analysis the perceptions of the Sorkhe Gov’s people about residential displacementconsequences. The research design was guided by a critical ethnographic approach. Participants included all residents of Sorkhe Gav village who had common experiences in residential displacement. Data was gathered by using semi-structured interviews, problem tree, observation and social maps. The participants were completely selected purposeful. The results showed that the urgency of the displacement process in the Sorkhe Gav village led to the neglect of participatory planning processes, and thus some of the physical considerations of housing in adaptation to social and environmental conditions were not considered. The findings revealed that only technical view on the displacement process of Sorkhe Gav village has not only caused undesirable physical and social consequences, but also made some of the positive consequences of displacement, such as housing resistance, as insignificant. In general, evidence suggested that the socio-economic consequences of residential displacement in the Sorkhe Gav village are increasingly attributable to physical consequences. Because the physical structures do not have much adaptation with the social, economic and climatic conditions of the area, and do not include previous experiences of inhabitants.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • "Common Perceptions"
  • "Residential Displacement"
  • "Critical Ethnography"
  • "Displacement Consequences"
  • "Sorkhe Gav Village"
  1. Aazami, M., Yaghooni Farani, A., & Moetaghed, M. (2015). Investigating the Status of Participation and its Influencing Factors on the Guide Plan of the Sangestan Village. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 4(2-46), 881-899.  (In Farsi)
  2. Abuya, W.O. (2013). What is in a coconut? An ethnoecological analysis of mining, social displacement, vulnerability, and development in rural Kenya. African Studies Quarterly, 14(1/2), 1.
  3. Agba, A.O., Akpanudoedehe, J., & Ushie, E. (2010). Socio-economic and cultural impacts of resettlement on Bakassi people of Cross River State, Nigeria. Studies in Sociology of Science, 1(2), 50.
  4. Alexandrescu, F. (2011). Gold and displacement in Eastern Europe: risks and uncertainty at Roşia Montană. Revista română de sociologie, 1-2.
  5. Bebbington, A., Bebbington, D.H., Bury, J., Lingan, J., Muñoz, J.P., & Scurrah, M. (2008). Mining and social movements: struggles over livelihood and rural territorial development in the Andes. World development, 36(12), 2888-2905.
  6. Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2008). Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Buzoianu, C. (2013). Misunderstanding opportunities:(post-) resettlement issues in the Recea neighbourhood of Alba Iulia.
  8. Carspecken, P.F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide: Psychology Press.
  9. Cernea, M.M. (2006). Population displacement inside protected areas: A redefinition of concepts in conservation policies. Policy Matters, 14, 8-26.

10. Cernea, M. M., & Schmidt-Soltau, K. (2003). The end of forcible displacements? Conservation must not impoverish people. Section I: The complexities of governing protected areas, 42.

11. Cernea, M. M., & Schmidt-Soltau, K. (2006). Poverty risks and national parks: Policy issues in conservation and resettlement. World development, 34(10), 1808-1830.

12. Downing, T.E. (2002). Avoiding new poverty: mining-induced displacement and resettlement (Vol. 52): International Institute for Environment and Development London.

13. Elizalde, B., Whellams, M., & Sabater, C. (2007). Reseña de las relaciones de Newmont con la comunidad: Mina de Yanacocha, Perú. In: Cajamarca: Canadian Business for Social Responsibility.

14. Fabricius, C., & de Wet, C. (2002). The influence of forced removals and land restitution on conservation in South Africa. Conservation and mobile indigenous peoples: displacement, forced settlement, and sustainable development, 10, 142.

15. Fernandes, W. (2006). Mines, mining and displacement in India. 2006). Managing the Social and Environmental Consequences of Coal Mining in India, The Indian School of Mines University, Dhanbad, 333-344.

16. Filer, C. (2000). Resettlement and Mining in Papua New Guinea. Paper presented at the Resettlement Policy and Practice in Southeast Asia and the Pacific: Proceedings of Workshops Held in Manila and Port Vila, Manila, 1998.

17. Franks, D.M., Davis, R., Bebbington, A. J., Ali, S. H., Kemp, D., & Scurrah, M. (2014). Conflict translates environmental and social risk into business costs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(21), 7576-7581.

18. Ganguly, V. (2004). Conservation, Displacement, and Deprivation: Maldhari of Gir Forest of Gujarat: Indian Social Institute.

19. Geisler, C. (2003). Your park, my poverty. Using impact assessment to counter displacement effects of environmental greenlining. See Brechin et al, 217-229.

20. Gharaghouzlou, H., Isalou, A.A., & Geravand, F. (2015). Evaluation of physical-spatial effects of residential displacement (Case study: Malavi district, Poldokhtar city). Regional Planning Journal, 4(16), 125-136. (In Farsi)

21. Gilkes, P. (1997). People on the Edge in the Horn: Displacement, land use and the environment in the Gedaref region, Sudan. In: JSTOR.

22. Goessling, K.P. (2010). Mining induced displacement and mental health: A call for action. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 32(3), 153-164.

23. Golbaz, M., Heydari, B., Hosseinzaheh Firouzi, J., Hayati, B., & Riyahi Dorcheh, F. (2017). Assessment of the Economic, Social and Environmental Impacts of the Dam and Tangab's Irrigation Network, Firouzabad in Fars. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 48(2), 179-195. (In Farsi)

24. Herbert, T., & Lahiri-Dutt, K. (2004). Coal sector loans and displacement of indigenous populations: lessons from Jharkhand. Economic and Political Weekly, 2403-2409.

25. Khatoon Abadi, S.A., Alipoor, E., & Ataei, M. (2017). Identifying the Relationship between Communication Styles in Communities of City, Village-City, Village: A  Survey in Khorasan Razavi Province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 2(48), 333-344.  (In Farsi)

26. Krausmann, E., Cozzani, V., Salzano, E., & Renni, E. (2011). Industrial accidents triggered by natural hazards: an emerging risk issue. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 11(3), 921.

27. Madison, D.S. (2011). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance: Sage.

28. Parasuraman, S. (2016). The development dilemma: Displacement in India: Springer.

29. Pinedo-Vasquez, M., & Padoch, C. (1993). Community and governmental experiences protecting biodiversity in the lowland Peruvian Amazon. Perspectives on Biodiversity: Case Studies of Genetic Resource Conservation and Development. AAAS Press, Washington, DC,  199-211.

30. Polit, D.F., & Beck, C.T. (2004). Nursing research: Principles and methods: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

31. Rahmati, A., & Nazreyan, A. (2011). Socio- economic and environmental impact of the resident area inforce to move due to dams constraction: case study dam,s Gotvand olia on the river of karoon. Enviromental Researches, 1(2), 53-66. (In Farsi)

32. Rahmati, M.M. (2006). Socioeconomic transformations of villages integration in the quaked areas of Roudbar and Manjil. Iranian Social Study Journal, 1 (2) ,83-110. (In Farsi)

33. Scudder, T. (1993). Development-induced relocation and refugee studies: 37 years of change and continuity among Zambia's Gwembe Tonga. Journal of Refugee Studies, 6(2), 123-152.

34. Thomas, J. (1993). Doing critical ethnography (Vol. 26): Sage.

35. Tilt, B., Braun, Y., & He, D. (2009). Social impacts of large dam projects: A comparison of international case studies and implications for best practice. Journal of environmental management, 90, S249-S257.

36. Turton, D. (2002). The Mursi and the elephant question. Conservation and Mobile Indigenous Peoples: Displacement, Forced Resettlement and Sustainable Development, 97-118.

37. Webber, M., & McDonald, B. (2004). Involuntary resettlement, production and income: Evidence from Xiaolangdi, PRC. World development, 32(4), 673-690.