بررسی نقش شایستگی ها و عوامل محیطی بر موفقیت کارآفرینان روستایی شهرستان کرمانشاه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه زراعت ، واحد کرمانشاه ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمانشاه، ایران

2 دانشگاه لرستان، دانشکده کشاورزی، گروه توسعه روستایی

3 دانشگاه رازی، دانشکده کشاورزی، گروه ترویج کشاورزی و توسعه روستایی

چکیده

هدف از این پژوهش بررسی اثر شایستگی­ها و عوامل محیطی مؤثر بر موفقیت کارآفرینان روستایی شهرستان کرمانشاه است. جامعه آماری مورد مطالعه شامل 110 نفر از کارآفرینان روستایی بود که با استفاده از جدول کرجسی و مورگان، حجم نمونه 86 نفر تعیین شد و برای دستیابی دقیق به افراد مورد مطالعه، از روش نمونه­گیری تصادفی طبقه­ای استفاده شد. به منظور گردآوری داده­ها، از ابزار پرسشنامه و برای تجزیه و تحلیل یافته­ها از تحلیل همبستگی و رگرسیون سلسله مراتبی استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که شایستگی­های سازماندهی و رهبری، فرصت و روابط از مهم­ترین شایستگی­های مؤثر بر موفقیت هستند. از دیدگاه کارآفرینان روستایی، محیط کسب و کار فعلی محیطی پویا و متخاصم است که در چنین محیطی کارآفرین برای کسب موفقیت نیازمند انعطاف­پذیری بالایی است و ماندگاری کسب و کار، بیشتر از سودآوری ارزشمند است. نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون سلسله مراتبی نیز نشان داد که متغیر محیط در رابطه بین شایستگی و موفقیت، نقش تعدیل کننده را ایفا می­کند. بنابر یافته­ها می­توان گفت که بخشی از اثر شایستگی بر موفقیت کارآفرینان از طریق محیط تبیین می­شود. بنابراین، در یک محیط پویا و متخاصم، کارآفرینانی که سطح بالایی از شایستگی­ها را دارند بهتر از کارآفرینانی با سطح پایین شایستگی عمل می­کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Role of Competencies and Environmental Factors on Success of Rural Entrepreneurs, in the Kermanshah Township

چکیده [English]

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of competencies and environmental factors on the success of rural entrepreneurs in Kermanshah Township. The statistical population consisted of 110 rural entrepreneurs, which with using Kerjci and Morgan table, a sample size of 86 people were selected by random sampling technique. To collect the data, questionnaire was used. Correlation and multiple regressions were conducted for data analysis. The results show that the organization and leadership, opportunities and relationships competencies are the most important competencies affecting success. From the perspective of rural entrepreneurs, the business environment is dynamic and hostile that in such an environment, the entrepreneur to be successful requires flexibility and the survival of the business; the greater the profitability is valuable. Results of multiple regression shows that environment plays a moderating role in the relationship between competences and the success of rural entrepreneurs. Therefore, in a dynamic and hostile environment, entrepreneurs with a high level of competence are better to act than entrepreneurs with low-level competence.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Entrepreneurship
  • Rural Entrepreneurship
  • Competency
  • Success
  • environmental factors

مراجع

  1. Ahmad, H.M., Ramayah, T., Wilson, C., & Kummerow, L. (2010).  Is entrepreneurial competency and business success relationship contingent upon business environment? : A study of Malaysian SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 16(3), 182-203 
  2. Ahmad, N. (2007). A cross-cultural study of entrepreneurial competencies and entrepreneurial success in SMEs in Australia and Malaysia, Thesis (Ph.D.), University of Adelaide, Adelaide Graduate School of Business.
  3. Ardichvilli, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 105-123.
  4. Barringer, B.R., & Harrison, J.S. (2000). Walking tightrope: Creating value through inter organizational relationships. Journal of Management, 26(3), 367-405.
  5. Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. (2001). A multidimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 292-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069456.
  6. Baum, J.R., & Locke, E.A. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 587-598.
  7. Bergevoet R. H. M. (2005). Entrepreneurship of Dutch dairy farmers. Department of SocialSciences. Wageningen University.
  8. Bickerdyke, I., Lattimore, R., & Madge, A. (2000). Business failure and change: an Australian perspective: Productivity commission staff research paper, ­Aus Info, Canberra.
  9. Brush, C., Greene, P., & Hart, M. (2001). From initial idea to unique advantage: the entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. Academy of Management Executive, 15, 64–78.
  10. Choi, Y.R., & Shephered, D.A. (2004). Entrepreneur’s decisions to exploit opportunities. Journal of Management, 30(3), 377-395.
  11. Covin, J., Slevin, D., & Heeley, M. (1999). Pioneers and followers: Competitive tactics, environment, and firm growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 175-210.
  12. Covin, J. G., Slevin, D. P., & Covin, T. J. (1990). Content and performance of growth-seeking strategies: A comparison of small firms in high-and low technology industries. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(6),391-412.
  13. Dixon, R., Meier, R. L., Brown, D. C., & Custer, R. L. (2005). The critical entrepreneurial competencies required by instructors from institution-based enterprises: A Jamaican study. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 42(4), 25-51.
  14. Entrialgo, M., Fernandez, E., & Vazquez, C.J. (2001). The effect of organizational context on SME s entrepreneurship: Some Spanish evidence. Small Business Economics, 16(3), 223-236.
  15. Fenwick, T. & S. Hutton. (2000). Women Crafting New Work: The Learning of Women Entrepreneurs, Proceedings of the Adult Education Research Council. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia.
  16. Freiling, J., & Laudien, S.M. (2013). Explaining New Venture Failure:A Competence-based Approach, Paper submitted to the AIMS 2013 Conference, Capacites Dynamiques et Innovation, April 11-12, 2013Nice (France).
  17. Gatewood, E.J., Shaver, K.G., Powers, J.B., & Gartner, W.B. (2002). Entrepreneurial expectancy, task effort, and performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(2), 187-206.
  18. Ghambarali, R., Zarafshani, K., & Alibaygi, A.H. (2008). Identifying Success Criteria among Rural Entrepreneurs: Using multidimensional Scaling, Entrepreneurship Development, 1(2), 131-160.
  19. Gorgiveski, M., Ascalon, J., & Evilina, M. (2005). Entrepreneurial success: what it means to different type of entrepreneurs. European Conference on work and Organizational psychology, Istanbul.
  20. Krishnan, L. (2013). The Role of Competencies and Personality in Determining Success of Entrepreneurs in SMEs in Karnataka, India. International Business Management, 7(4): 258-266.
  21. Kyro, P. (2001). Women Entrepreneurs Question Men's Criteria for Success. Proceedings 2001. Edition, Babson College, Wellesley. Massachusetts.
  22. Lindelof, P., & Lofsten, H. (2006). Environmental hostility and firm behavior: an empirical examination of new technology-based firms on sciences parks. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(3), 386-406.
  23. Man, W. Y. T. (2001). Entrepreneurial competencies and the performance of small and medium enterprises in the Hong Kong services sector (Doctoral dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University).
  24. Man, T. W. Y., Lau, T., & Snape, E. )2008(. Entrepreneurial competencies and the performance of small and medium enterprises: An investigation through a framework of competitiveness. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 21(3), 257-276.
  25. Miner, J.B. (1997). A psychological typology and its relationship to entrepreneurial success. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 9. 319-334
  26. Moghimi, S.M. (2001). Organization and  management: research approach, Tehran, Termeh Press. (In Farsi)
  27. Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur's business model: Toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726-735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.001.
  28. Orser, B., Riding. A., & Cedzynski. M. (2005). Dimensions of perceived success a mong Canadian business owner. Journal of small business management. P.50.
  29. Porter, M.E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (Special Issue for winter), 95-117.
  30. Ramsden, M., & Bennett, R.J. (2005). The benefits of external support to SMEs: “Hard” versus “soft” outcomes and satisfaction levels, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(2), 227-243.
  31. Sambasivan, M., Abdul, M., & Yusop, Y. (2009). Impact of personal qualities and management skills of entrepreneurs on venture performance in Malaysia: Opportunity recognition skills as a mediating factor. Technovation, 798-805.
  32. Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. The Academy ofManagement Review, 25: 217-226.
  33. Sohi, R.S. (1996). The effects of environmental dynamism and heterogeneity on sales people’s role perceptions, performance and job satisfaction. European Journal of Marketing, 30(7), 49-67.
  34. Solesvik, M. (2012). Entrepreneurial competencies in emerging economy context. In 17th Nordic Conference on Small Business Research, Helsinki.–2012.–23-25 May.
  35. Sony, H.P., & Iman, S. (2005). Relationship between entrepreneurial learning, entrepreneurial competencies and venture success: empirical study on SMEs. Int. J. Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management. 5(5/6), 454-468.

Wasilcczuk, J. (2000). Advantageous competence of owner/managers to grow the firm in Poland: Empirical evidence. Journal of Small Business Management, 38(2), 88-94.

تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران
دوره 47، شماره 2
شهریور 1395
صفحه 521-532

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار