بررسی اثرگذاری دارایی‌های معیشتی بر تنوع معیشت روستاییان (مورد مطالعه: شهرستان باوی)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده مهندسی زراعی و عمران روستایی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، ملاثانی، اهواز، ایران.

2 گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده مهندسی زراعی و عمران روستایی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، ملاثانی، اهواز، ایران

3 گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده مهندسی زراعی و عمران روستایی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، ملاثانی، اهواز، ایران

چکیده

یکی از چالش‌های اساسی توسعهی‌ی مناطق روستایی در دهه‌های اخیر موضوع ناپایداری معیشت مردم است که منجر به آثار و پیامدهای ناگوار اقتصادی و اجتماعی می‌گردد. بنابراین، از مهم‌ترین و تأثیرگذارترین بسترهای پیشبرد اهداف توسعه در نواحی روستایی، شناخت وضعیت معیشتی خانوارها، میزان دسترسی به دارایی‌های معیشتی و عوامل مؤثر بر معیشت است.
  پژوهش حاضر، با هدف بررسی میزان تاثیرگذاری دارایی‌های معیشتی بر تنوع معیشت روستاییان انجام شده است؛ جهت نیل به این هدف از روش پیمایشی برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها استفاده گردید. جامعه آماری، خانوارهای روستایی شهرستان باوی به تعداد 6670 خانوار بودند که از بین آن‌ها نمونه‌ای به حجم 260 نفر بر اساس جدول کرجسی و مورگان و با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی خوشه‌ای انتخاب شد. برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها، از پرسشنامه استفاده شد که روایی آن بر اساس نظرات اساتید و صاحب‌نظران مورد تایید قرار گرفت. برای اطمینان از پایایی آن، یک مطالعه راهنما بر روی نمونه‌ای خارج از محدوده تحقیق انجام گرفت و اندازه ضرایب آلفا برای متغیرهای تحقیق قابل قبول ارزیابی شد. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزارهای Excel2013 و SPSS20 استفاده گردید.
  نتایج نشان داد که میزان تنوع معیشت در بین ساکنان روستاهای شهرستان باوی در سطح پایین می‌باشد. وضعیت روستاها از نظر برخورداری از دارایی‌های معیشتی متفاوت بوده و خانوارهای دارای تنوع معیشتی در مورد تمام داریی‌های معیشتی از وضعیت بهتری نسبت به خانوارهای فاقد تنوع معیشت برخوردار بودند. همچنین نتایج برآورد مدل رگرسیونی نیز نشان داد که متغیرهای دارایی‌های معیشتی به همراه سایر متغیرهای سابقه کار غیرکشاورزی، سابقه کار کشاورزی و سن 4/32 درصد از تغییرات متغیر وابسته تنوع معیشت را تبیین می‌کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


Extended Abstract

Background and Objective

One of the most important platforms to achiev the goals of development in rural areas, especially in developing countries, is to know the livelihood status and households' access to livelihood assets (Eisa Zehi and Sharifzadeh, 2022; Barimani et al., 2016). Despite the dependence of the rural economy on agricultural and non-agricultural products, most of the poor villagers in developing countries are dependent on micro-farming and mainly benefit from agriculture-related livelihood strategies (Shanazi and Aazami, 2016). Since livelihood diversity is considered as a suitable strategy to increase the sustainability of rural areas (Hosseini et al., 2022), in order to improve livelihood strategies of rural households, diversification of agricultural and non-agricultural activities and supplementary income sources have been emphasized (Shanazi and Aazami,2016). Among the factors that change the livelihood of rural households, climate changes (Asravor, 2018; Maru et al., 2021), the limitation of environmental resources such as land and water (Djurfeldt & Djurfeldt, 2013), small land tenure system and low productivity (Kifle et al., 2016) can be considered as great importance. Subsistence or capital assets have a significant role in supporting livelihood and so far five categories of them including human, social, natural, physical and financial capital have been identified (Timalsina, 2007) and displayed in the form of a pentagonal model. In the middle of this pentagon, there is zero access, while the maximum access to funds and assets occurs in its outer space. Considering the important role of these capitals in diversity of rural livelihoods, this research investigated the relationship between thses capitals and livelihood diversity among residents of rural areas of Bavi County in Khuzestan province. For this purpose, first, the level of livelihood assets and the livelihood diversity of the villagers were measured and then the variables affecting livelihood diversity were investigated.

 

Methodology

This research was conducted using the survey method in rural areas of Bavi County, located approximately in 35 km from the city of Ahvaz in Khuzestan province. Existence of fertile lands and locating at the rout of Karun, Dez and Gargar rivers are the main characteristics of this area (Mousavi et al., 2015). The statistical population of the research composed of 6670 rural households that based on Kerjcie and Morgan table, a sample of 260 as the head of households was selected considering random cluster sampling method; Then, the necessary data was collected using a questionnaire. Based on the purpose of the research, livelihood diversity was considered as the dependent variable and individual features along with the five assets were considered as the independent variables. Weighting coefficients were used to convert variables such as the number of livestock or cars into monetary units, and a normalization process was followed for variables did not have the same measurement unit. Also, to calculate the total asset, the weight of each asset was calculated using the principle component analysis. The final value of livelihood asset, then, was made by a weighted average of the five assets. Herfindahl index was calculated to represent the livelihood diversity. To analyze data, an independent t-test was performed to compare the mean of the respondents’ livelihood assets under with and without livelihood diversity, and linear regression was used to investigate variables affecting livelihood diversity.

 

Results

The results showed that about 45% of the respondents had a second job and agriculture was the first job of more than half of them. Also, about 55 percent of the respondents lacked livelihood diversity. In terms of livelihood assets, only in relation to physical assets, the villages have a relatively favorable situation. The weights calculated for financial and social assets were higher than the other ones. The results of measuring Herfindahl index for the rural households showed that livelihood diversity of the studied villages represented a low level. The amount of Pearson's correlation coefficient indicated a positive and significant relationship between all livelihood assets and the livelihood diversity variable. The comparison results of independent t-test showed that the mean of livelihood assets of people showing livelihood diversity are higher than those lacking. The results of linear regression of the factors affecting livelihood diversity showed that livelihood assets along with the variables of age, agricultural and non-agricultural work experience have a significant effect on livelihood diversity at a significant level of less than 5%. Among livelihood assets, natural, financial and social assets have the greatest impact on the livelihood diversity.

 

Conclusion

Diversification of rural livelihoods is a suitable strategy to increase the sustainability of villages and it depends on variables such as human, social, natural, physical and financial assets. The results of the study showed that despite the low level of livelihood diversity among the studied villages, they are different from each other in this respect. It can be said that the distance and proximity to the metropolis of Ahvaz, the existence of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, as well as the Ramin power plant are effective in this difference. The positive relationship between livelihood assets and the diversity of livelihoods should be taken into consideration by decision makers in terms of increasing capital assets in the rural areas. Considering that non-agricultural work experience as the most important predictor of livelihood diversity, it is recommended to plan for diversifying the income sources of villagers in rural areas. Of course, the low coefficient of determination in the estimated regression shows that other important variables affect livelihood diversity and should be noticed and explored in the future studies.

Aazami, M., Bakhtiari, A. & Shanazi, K. (2018). Livelihood effects of the aquaculture fish farming units on occupier household (the case of Hamedan province)Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 49(4), 735-747. Doi: 10.22059/IJAEDR.2018.251433.668557 (In Persian).
Asravor, R. K. (2018). Livelihood diversification strategies to climate change among smallholder farmers in Northern Ghana. Journal of International Development, 30(8), 1318-1338.
Barimani, F., Rasti, H., Reisi, I., & Mohammad, Z. M. (2016). Analyzing the geographical factors effective on the household livelihood in rural settlements case study: township Qasrqand.Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 18, 85-96. (In Persian).
Djurfeldt, A. A., & Djurfeldt, G. (2013). Structural transformation and African smallholders: Drivers of mobility within and between the farm and non-farm sectors for eight countries. Oxford Development Studies, 41(3), 281-306.
Démurger, S., Fournier, M., & Yang, W. (2010). Rural households' decisions towards income diversification: Evidence from a township in northern China. China Economic Review, 21, S32-S44.
Eisa Zehi, A. & Sharifzadeh, M. (2022). Analyzing the condition of rural sustainable livelihood capitals in the town of Saravan. Space Economics and Rural Development, 2(36), 79-98. (In Persian).
Fang, Y., Fan, J., Shen, M., & Song, M. (2014). Sensitivity of livelihood strategy to livelihood capital in mountainareas: Empirical analysis based on different settlements in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River, China. Ecological Indicators, 38: 225– 235
Fang,Su., & HaiYang, S. (2012). Relationship analysis between livelihood assets and livelihood strategies: A Heihe River basin example. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 4(3), 0265–0274
Garibaldi. L. A., Gemmill-Herren. B., D’Annolfo. R., Graeub. B. E., Cunningham. S. A., & Breeze. T. D. (2017). Farming approaches for greater biodiversity, livelihoods, and food security. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 32(1), 68- 80.
Gentle, P., & Maraseni, T. (2012). Climate change, poverty and livelihoods: Adaptation practices by rural mountain communities in Nepal. Environmental Science & Policy, 21, 24–34. Doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.007.
Guillotrea, P., Campling, L., & Robinson, J. (2012) Vulnerability of small Island fishery economies to climate and institutional changes. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 287-291.
Guillen, L., Coromina, L., & Saris, W. E. (2011). Measurement of social participation and its place in social capital theory. Social Indicators Research100(2), 331-350.
Haggblade, S., Hazell, P., & Thomas, R. (2010). The rural nonfarm economy: prospects for growth and poverty reduction. World Development, 38 (10), 1429-1441.
Hosseini, S.K., Forouzani, M., & Abdeshahi, A. (2022). Investigating the relationship between economic and social sustainability and livelihood diversity. Iran Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 17(2), 11-27. (In Persian).
Idowu, A. O., Aihonsu, J. O. Y., Olubanjo, O. O., & Shittu, A. M. (2011). Determinants of income diversification among farm households in South-West Nigeria. Economics and Finance Review, 1(5), 33-34.
Karami Dehkordi, E. & Ansari, A. (2012). The effect of pasture and watershed projects on the sustainable livelihood of rural households in the city of Zanjan. Agricultural Modern Thechnologies, 5(2), 107-136. (In Persian).
Khatun, D & Roy, B.C. (2016). Rural Livelihood Diversification in West Bengal: Nature and Extent. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 29(2), 183-190.
Kifle. S., Teferi, B., Kebedom, A., & Abiyot, L. (2016). Factors influencing farmers decision on the use of introduced soil and water conservation practices in the lowland’s of Wenago Woreda, Gedeo Zone, Ethiopia. American Journal of Rural, 41(1), 24-30.
Maru, H., Haileslassie, A., Zeleke, T., & Esayas, B. (2021). Analysis of smallholders’ livelihood vulnerability to drought across agroecology and farm typology in the upper Awash Sub-Basin, Ethiopia. Sustainability, 13(17), 9764. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su13179764
Mazibuko, S. (2013). Understanding underdevelopment through the sustainable livelihoods approach. Community Development44(2), 173-187.
Mirakzadeh, A., Khaledi, E., & Gholami, M. (2017). Investigation of Effective factors and barriers on Development of non-agricultural activities with emphasis on home jobs (Case: Ghory Ghale Village). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research48(3), 533-545.
Mousavi, M., Khosravipour, B., & Sorkhi, A. (2015). Identify factors affecting on attitude of vegetable growers at Bavi city in Khuzestan province towards organic farming. Rural Development Strategies, 1(4), 105-118. (In Persian).
Oumer A. M., & de Neergaard A. (2011). Understanding livelihood strategy-poverty links: empirical evidence from central highlands of Ethiopia, Environment Development and Sustainability, 13, 547–564.
Perz, S.G.L. (2005). The importance of household– asset diversity for livelihood diversity and welfare among small farm colonists in the Amazon. The Journal of Development Studies, 41(7), 1193-1220
Ramezani F., Ghasemi, M., & Zarghani, H. (2021). Analysis of households' livelihoods in border villages (case study: Torbat-e-Jam county). Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences , 21(60), 441-463. (In Persian).
Saadat, M.A., & Saiful Islam, A.K.M. (2011). Impact of climate change on rural livelihood: A case study. 3rd International Conference on Water & Flood Management (ICWFM-2011 January), Dhaka, Bangladesh
Sadeghie-e-Chamchengi, S., Taghdisi, A., & Seydaiee, S. E. (2016). The effect of economic diversity on rural regions, Sustainability (Case study: Shahrekord county rural areas). Journal of Research and Rural Planning5(3), 25-37. (In Persian).
Saeidi rad, M., Razani, A., & Razaviyan, M. (2020). Analysis Of Livelihood Capitals In Rural Regions (Case study: Qasr Qand County). Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 10(37), 167-186. (In Persian).
Safa, L., Rzaei, R., & Aminfanak. (2022). Developing the Strategies to Diversify the Rural Households' Livelihoods to Revitalize Lake Urmia. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 53(2), 515-537. (In Persian).
Safaiepour, M., & Shanbepour, F. (2016). A classification of Khuzestan province based on cultural development indices using gray relations analysis. Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies, 3(8), 7-18. (In Persian).
Salarpoor, M., & Khodadadi Hosseini, M. (2015). The evaluation of rural income diversity in Zabol. Rural Economic research, 2(4), 69-80. (In Persian).
Shanazi, K., & Aazami, M. (2018). The impacts of Zarivar wetland on the sustainable livelihoods of rural households. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal13(2), 235-249. (In Persian).
Sojasi Ghidari, H., Sadeqlu, T., & Shakourifard, E. (2016). Measuring the livelihood properties in rural areas using a sustainable livelihood approach (Case study: rural areas of Taybad County). Journal of Research and Rural planning, 5(1), 197-215. (In Persian).
Statistical Center of Iran. (2011). Population and housing census. Retrieved from https://www.amar.org.ir
Tang, Q., Sean, J. B., Xu, Y., & Li, Y. (2013). Agricultural practices and sustainable livelihoods: Rural transformation within the Loess Plateau, China. Applied Geography, 41, 15-23.
Teshome, A., de Graaff, J., Ritsema, C., & Kassie, M. (2016). Farmers' perceptions about the influence of land quality, land fragmentation and tenure systems on sustainable land management in the North Western Ethiopian Highlands. Land Degradation Development, 27, 884– 898. doi: 10.1002/ldr.2298.
Timalsina, K.P. (2007). Rural urban migration and livelihood in the informal sector, a study of Street Vendor of Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal. (Masters of science thesis in development studies, NTNU University, Trondheim, Norway.
Ulrich, A., Speranza, C.I., Roden, P., Kiteme, B., & Wiesmann, U. (2012). Small-scale farming in semi-arid areas: livelihood dynamics between 1997 and 2010 in Laikipia,Kenya. Journal of Rural Studies, 28, 241–251.
Yadolahi Farsi, J., & Razavi, S. M. (2011). The role of human and social capital in youth entrepreneurship in Korbal rural areas. Human geography research44(1), 103-116. (In Persian).
Yasouri, M., & Javan, F. (2015). Analysis of limitation in rural economy diversification case of: Upper Ashkevar in Rudsar County. Space Economic and Rural Development, 4(3), 19-37. (In Persian).