واکاوی علل عدم مشارکت بخش خصوصی در معرفی و تولید بذر ارقام اصلاح شده داخلی سبزی و صیفی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیات علمی موسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران

2 عضو هیات علمی موسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج ، ایران

چکیده

هدف اصلی این پژوهش بررسی عمده­ترین چالش­های مشارکت شرکت­های خصوصی فعال در کشور در حوزه سبزی و صیفی در معرفی ارقام محصولات مختلف سبزی و صیفی و همچنین تولید و تکثیر بذر ارقام معرفی شده داخلی از دیدگاه مدیران عامل این شرکت­ها و راهکارهای رفع این چالش­ها بوده است. این پژوهش از نوع تحقیقات کیفی بوده و از روش­شناسی نظریه داده بنیاد به منظور دستیابی به هدف تحقیق استفاده شد. جامعه آماری این مطالعه کلیه شرکت­های خصوصی عضو انجمن واردکنندگان بذر بودند که در سال 1399، تعداد آنها 37 شرکت بود که در نهایت 11 نفر آنها با استفاده از روش نمونه­گیری گلوله برفی انتخاب شدند. به منظور جمع­آوری داده­ها از پرسشنامه نیمه­ساختاریافته استفاده شد. به منظور اطمینان از روایی و پایایی داده‌ها در بخش کیفی، علاوه بر بهره­گیری از روش‌های مختلفی چون یادداشت­برداری و ضبط صـدا، نتـایج به 4 نفر از مصاحبه­شوندگان برای بررسی و تائید ارسال شد. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از روش تحلیل مقایسه مداوم استفاده شد. در نهایت، علاوه بر ارائه مدل الگویی این مطالعه، چالش­های شناسایی شده در پنج دسته شامل؛ چالش­های؛ سرمایه­گذاری و دانشی، تغییر نگرش بهره­برداران و کاهش قدرت ریسک آنها، حمایت دولت، بازارپسندی و کیفیت ارقام معرفی شده و عدم موفقیت بخش دولتی در ایجاد اطمینان و جلب مشارکت بخش خصوصی طبقه­بندی شدند. پیشنهاد اصلی این مطالعه، تدوین راهکارهایی به منظور توسعه همکاری­های مشترک و مکمل بین دو بخش دولتی و خصوصی و افزایش اعتماد بین این دو نهاد است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


Extended abstract

Objectives

The main purpose of this study was to investigate the main challenges of seed companies` participation in breeding of vegetable crops and seed production of inland and improved varieties and the main solutions to solve these challenges.

 

Methods

This research is a qualitative research and grounded theory methodology was used as the research methodology. The statistical population of this study was all seed companies which are members of the Seed Importers Association (N=37) selected by snowball sampling method. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect data. In order to test the validity and reliability of the collected data, in addition to using various methods such as interviews, note-taking and voice recording during the data collection process, the results were also sent to 4 interviewees for review and approval after the transcription of the interview text and the initial extraction of codes and concepts. Strauss-Corbin method of continuous comparison analysis was used to analyze the data. The categories resulting from axial coding were regulated in the framework of a model that addresses the conditions and contexts, processes (or strategies) and consequences of seed companies` participation in breeding and seed production of domestic varieties.

Results

After a detailed and line-by-line review of the transcript contents of the interviews, in the first stage, about 150 initial codes or concepts were extracted from interviews with eexecutive officers of seed companies operating in the field of seed imports or their representatives. Then, these concepts were coded in the form of 33 major categories in the second stage of coding, which was pivotal coding, and in order to further integrate the extracted codes and determine the categories. In the continuation of the data analysis process, the identified challenges in the field of the central theme under study are thematically divided into five categories; Investment and knowledge challenges, government support challenges, challenges to change the attitude of users and reduce their risk power, challenges related to marketing and quality of the introduced figures, and the failure of the public sector to create trust and participation of the private sector was categorized. The solutions provided by the respondents were also identified and classified into 4 categories.

 

Discussion

In the field of breeding, it was found that in general, seed companies active in the field of seeds can be classified into two categories: The first class, whose number is also limited, are companies with a history of establishment, high experience and activity in the market, well-equipped facilities, manpower, experienced breeders and financial resources compared to other companies, have a high share of the market in terms of imports and supply of seeds in. Following the imposition of sanctions, rising currency prices, problems related to the economic situation, and the instability of the country's policies and international relations, these companies have been operating independently or with the participation of the knowledge-based companies for several years have implemented breeding projects and introduced the variety in a participatory manner. In general, these companies have not had a positive attitude towards partnership with the public sector in the field of breeding and introduction of varieties. The second category, which most of the studied companies fall in this category, are companies that face more restrictions in terms of facilities and equipment, manpower, experts in the field of breeding and financial resources compared to the first category. Most companies in this category currently do not have access to germplasm and breeding materials, and experienced breeders to enter the breeding process. These companies have mainly focused on seed imports. However, during recent years with increasing problems related to seed imports into the country, and increasing the price of imported seeds has increased the adoption rate of inland seeds by farmers (especially middle- and lower-class farmers). Therefore, if the private sector is sure of the quality of the introduced variety, its yield, its resistance to various stresses and other quantitative and qualitative characteristics, it will be willing to participate in the seed production of varieties introduced by the public sector.

Aghaie, M.J. (2018). Challenges and Opportunities of Seed Production in Iran. Proceedings of the 15th National Congress of Agricultural Sciences and Plant Breeding. Karaj, Seed and Plant Improvement Institutre, 4-6 Sep. 2018.
Ahmadi, K., Ebadzadeh, H., Hatami, F., Mohammadnia Afrouzi, Sh., Esfandyari pour, E. and Abas taghani, R. (2021). Agricultural statistics of the crop year 1398-99. First Edition. Tehran: Ministry of Jihad Agriculture, Deputy of Planning and Economy, Information and Communication Technology Center (In Persian).
Atilaw, A., Alemu, D., Bishaw, Z., Kifle, T. and Kaske, K. (2017). Early Generation Seed Production and Supply in Ethiopia: Status, Challenges and Opportunities. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Science, 27(1): 99-119.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Galushko, V. and Gray, R. (2014). Twenty five years of private wheat breeding in the UK: Lessons for other countries. Science and Public Policy (2014):1–15.
Given, L. M. (2008). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research method. London, Sage Publications.
Iran Biotechnology Information Database. (2018). Interview with Dr. Mohammad Jafar Aghaei on the challenges and opportunities of seed production in Iran. September 25, 2016 at 19:57. Available at: http://irbic.ir/12091/ (In Persian).
Jaffee, S. and Srivastava, J. (1994). The Roles of the Private and Public Sectors in Enhancing the Performance of Seed Systems. The World Bank Research Observer, 9(1):97-117.
Kamara, D.O. (2015).quality sedd and rice production in Sierra Leone?: as assessment of the challenges faced by small holder rice farmers. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Pan African Institute for development, Cameroon, West Africa.
Kifle, T. and Atilaw, A. (2018). Constraints to private seed sector development in Ethiopia: A case study. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 13(48), pp. 2748-2756 .
 Kolady, D.E. and Awal, A. (2018). Seed industry and seed policy reforms in Bangladesh: impacts and implications. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 21(7): 989-1001.
Koundinya, A.V.V. (2014). Indian vegetable seeds industry: status and challenges. International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences, 4(4): 62-69.
Loch, D.S. and Boyce, K.G. (2003). Balancing public and private sector roles in aneffective seed supply system. Field Crops Research, 84 (2003) 105–122.
Madanirad, M. (2015). Study and analysis of the field production process and consumption of improved seeds in the country (challenges and solutions). Research project report, No. 845741. Tehran, Agricultural Planning, Economics and Rural Development Research Institute.
Pasha Sharifi, H. and Sharifi, N. (2020). Research Methods in Behavioral Sciences. Tehran: Skills Printing. Thirteenth edition (In Persian).
Schreinemachers, P., Chandra Rao, K.P., Easdown, W., Hanson, P. and Kuma, S. (2017). The contribution of international vegetable breeding to private seed companies in India. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 64:1037–1049
Schreinemachers, P., Howard, J., Turner, M. (2021). Africa’s evolving vegetable seed sector: status, policy options and lessons from Asia. Food Security, 13: 511–523 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01146-y.
Shah Mansouri, A. and Abbasi, Z. (2014). The need to produce vegetable and summer F1 hybrid seeds using native germplasm in Iran, Proceedings of the First International Congress and the 13th Iranian Genetics Congress, Tehran, Iranian Genetic Association (In Persian).
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (2014). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Second Edition. Translated by Biok Mohammadi. Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies (In Persian).
Taher Hasan. A.A, and Chaudhuri, S.K. (2020). Erosion of Traditional Seed Supply System in Murshidabad District of West Bengal. Journal of Extension Education, 32(1): 6463-6467.
Tehran Chamber  of Commerce, Industries, Mines and Agriculture. (2020). Statistics and charts of imports leading to March 2017 (country, customs, tariff). Retrieved July 13, 1400. From: https://tccim.ir/ImpExpStats_TarrifCustomCountry.aspx?slcImpExp=Import&slcCountry=&sYear=1399&mode=doit (In Persian).