تحلیل و شناسایی مولفه های ناپایداری حوضه های آبریز ایران (کاربرد شاخص فقر آبی در مقیاس حوضه آبریز)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

2 گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.

چکیده

ایران در منطقه فرونشینی توده‌های هوا در چرخه آب و هوایی نیم‌کره شمالی زمین قرار گرفته است، به همین دلیل بیش از دو سوم از پهنۀ آن دارای آب و هوای خشک و نیمه خشک می‌باشد. کاهش سرانه منابع آب تجدیدشونده، گسترش منابع آلوده‌کننده آب، اضافه برداشت از سفره-های آب زیرزمینی عمده‌ چالش‌های موجود در بخش منابع آب ایران بشمار رفته و حوضه‌های آبریز کشور را در شرایط ناپایدار قرار داده است. این مطالعه به دنبال شناخت عوامل اثرگذار بر ناپایداری به سنجش وضعیت حوضه‌های آبریز کشور از لحاظ فقر آبی می‌پردازد. برای این منظور از اطلاعات اجتماعی، اقتصادی و زیست‌محیطی سال 1395 وضعیت پایداری حوضه‌های آبریز کشور و عوامل اثرگذار مشخص شده است. به طور کلی، نتایج نشان می‌دهد، میانگین شاخص فقر آبی در کل حوضه‌های آبریز کشور برابر با 73/43 است. در این میان مؤلفۀ منابع و مصرف با 24/19 و 85/36 کم‌ترین مقادیر را در میان مؤلفه‌ها دارا هستند. همچنین بر اساس رتبه‌بندی شاخص فقر آبی، حوضه‌های آبریز کویر درانجیر، بلوچستان جنوبی، هامون جازموریان، قره‌سو و گرگان، کل- مهران و بندرعباس-سدیج ناپایدار و حوضه‌های آبریز سفیدرود بزرگ، مرزی غرب، دریاچه ارومیه و کارون بزرگ فاقد تنش آبی بوده و دارای پایداری کامل آبی هستند. با توجه به نتایج، پیشنهاد می‌شود تا در راستای برقراری مدیریت یکپارچۀ منابع آب با استفاده از رویکردهای جامع‌نگر به ارزیابی وضعیت منابع آبی مناطق پرداخته شود

کلیدواژه‌ها


Extended Abstract

Objectives

Water is an essential element for human survival without which human life is inconceivable. Iran is located in an area of climate cycle of the northern hemisphere in which the air masses subside. That is why more than two-thirds of this country has arid and semi-arid climates. Inappropriate temporal- spatial precipitation distribution is one of the climatic features of Iran. Iran's share of the world's population is 1.3% and of freshwater resources only 0.2%. The major challenges facing the water resources that cause unsustainability of the drainage basins include unsuitable decrease in renewable water resources, increase of water pollutants, groundwater over-extraction (due to limited available surface water resources), uneven precipitation distribution and non-conformity of urbanization patterns and residential centers with respect to water resources and crop production methods (from the perspective of eco-friendliness).  Therefore, a proper understanding of the impact of human activities that manifested in the processes and mechanisms we observe in a drainage basin can help us conserve water resources and contribute to its sustainability. In this regard, integrated water-resource management has been interpreted as the operational method of water-resource sustainability. Therefore, seeking to identify factors impacting non-sustainability, the present research assesses the current situation in the drainage basins of Iran from this perspective.

 

Methods

For this purpose, social, economic and environmental information and water poverty index (WPI) were used to analyze the conditions of the drainage basins in the country with respect to the five components of resources, access, capacity, consumption, and the environment. Statistical methods were then employed to rank the drainage basins in the country in 2016 in terms of the mentioned components. Since the economic, social and environmental data collection on the drainage basin scale is costly and time consuming, and given the share each county has in the rescaled drainage basins, the data were extracted on the administrative (political boundaries) scale.

 

Results

  The results showed that the average value of the WPI in all the drainage basins was 43.73 with its lowest and highest values recorded in the Sefidrood Drainage basin (57.58) and the Kavir Drainage Basin in Anjir (27.55). Investigation of the five WPI components in the drainage basins also indicated that the resources and consumption components with 19.24 and 36.86 had the lowest values among the components. This demonstrated the poor conditions of the drainage basins in the country in terms of the resource component and in relation to the high share that water consumption had in the agricultural sector regarding unsustainability of the drainage basins. The access component had the third place with an average of 46.60 which indicated inadequate access of the sectors with water demands to wastewater discharge and treatment systems. Moreover, based on the ranking in the WPI, the Kavir in Anjir drainage basin in Southern Baluchistan and the Hamun-e- Jazmourian, the Gharasoo, the Gorgan, the Kal, the Mehran and the Bandar Abbas-Sedij drainage basins were unsustainable, and the Greater Sefidrood, the West Border, the Lake Urmia, and the Greater Karun drainage basins lacked water stress and enjoyed total water sustainability. The results of the correlation matrix indicating the correlations between the WPI and its components revealed that all five components, except for the capacity component, had significant positive correlations with the WPI. Therefore, it can be said that increased access to water resources will improve the ability and efficiency of the management system and raise the per capita domestic water consumption in the drainage basins. In addition, increased ability and efficiency of the water-resource management system led to savings in water consumption.

 

Discussion

Based on the results, it is suggested that, in line with the establishment of integrated water resources management, holistic approaches be used to evaluate the situation of water resources in the various regions. Considering the inappropriate conditions of the resources component in the drainage basins, it is also recommended that the government supervise the consumption volumes of the limited water resources and take steps toward integrated water-resource management by promoting water consumption savings. Due to the large share that the consumption component has in the unsustainable situation of the drainage basins, it is suggested that increases in area dedicated to irrigated agriculture be limited in the drainage basins that face water stress. Moreover, because of the significant positive correlation between the consumption component and the WPI, one can expect improvement in water sustainability through promoting savings in water consumption and reducing acreage of land under cultivation of irrigated crops. Regarding the components of capacity, access and the environment, there are positive and significant relationship between them and the WPI. Therefore, it is recommended that the government implement policies to increase social capacity, equipment and facilities required for providing water resources and water treatment plants and to reduce fertilizer application in the country's drainage basins.

Adger WN, Brooks N, Bentham G, Agnew M, Eriksen S. (2004). New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Álvarez, B. L., De León, G. S., Leal, J. A. R., Ramírez, J. M., El Colegio De San Luis, A. C., & Del Parque, F. C. (2015). Water Poverty Index in Subtropical Zones: The Case of Huasteca Potosina, Mexico. Revista Internacional De Contaminación Ambiental, 31(2), 173-184.
Awojobi, O. N. (2014). Water Poverty Index: An Apparatus for Integrated Water Management in Nigeria. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 8(2), 591.
Brooks N, Adger WN, Kelly PM. 2005. The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Glob Environ Chang, 15:151–163.
Chenoweth, J. (2008). A re-assessment of indicators of national water scarcity. Water International, 33(1), 5-18.
El-Gafy, I. K. E. D. (2018). The water poverty index as an assistant tool for drawing strategies of the Egyptian water sector. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9(2), 173-186.
Falkenmark, M., & Rockström, J. (2004). Balancing water for humans and nature - the new approach in ecohydrology. London: Earthscan.
Feitelson, E., & Chenoweth, J. (2002). Water poverty: Towards a meaningful indicator.Water Policy, 4(3), 263-281.
Global Water Partnership. Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). (1996). Integrated Water Resources Management.
Gong, L., Chunling, J., & Sun, W. (2013). Water security evaluation system based on water poverty index. Food, Agriculture and Environment, 11(3&4), 2521-2526.
        Hoseini, S., Nazari, M., Araghinejad, S. (2013). Investigating the impacts of climate on agricultural sector with emphasis on the role of adaptation strategies in this sector. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 44(1), 1-16. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2013.36064.
Hosseinzad, J., Kazemiyeh, F. (2013). The Role of Water Resources Management in Agricultural Development of Tabriz Plain. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 44(3), 369-377. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2013.50225.
Iran Water Resources Management. Yearbook 2017.
Jemmali, H., & Matoussi, M. S. (2013). A multidimensional analysis of water poverty at local scale: application of improved water poverty index for Tunisia. Water Policy, 15(1), 98-115.
Komnenic, V., Ahlers, R., & van der Zaag, P. (2009). Assessing the usefulness of the water poverty index by applying it to a special case: Can one be water poor with high levels of access? Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 34(4-5), 219-224.
Korc, M. E., & Ford, P. B. (2013). Application of the Water Poverty Index in border colonias of west Texas. Water Policy, 15(1), 79-97.
Lawrence P, Meigh J, Sullivan C (2002). The Water Poverty Index: an International Comparison, Keele Economics Research Papers, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK peagent.
Li, X., Wan, J., & Jia, J. L. (2011). Application of the water poverty index at the districts of Yellow River Basin. In Advanced Materials Research (Vol. 250, pp. 3469-3474). Trans Tech Publications.
Manandhar, S., Pandey, V. P., & Kazama, F. (2012). Application of water poverty index (WPI) in Nepalese context: a case study of Kali Gandaki River Basin (KGRB). Water resources management, 26(1), 89-107.
Ministry of Agriculture Jihad. Yearbook 2017.
Mirzaei, A., Zibaei, M., Esmaeili, A., Bakhshoodeh, M. (2019). Land use Changes Prediction and Environmentally Unstable Areas Prioritization of Halil-Rud River Basin. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 50(2), 231-248. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2018.263283.668635
Norman, E. S., Dunn, G., Bakker, K., Allen, D. M., & De Albuquerque, R. C. (2013). Water security assessment: integrating governance and freshwater indicators. Water Resources Management, 27(2), 535-551.
Ohlsson, L., & Turton, A. R. (1999). The turning of a screw: Social resource scarcity as a bottle-neck in adaptation to water scarcity. MEWREW Occasional Paper No. 19, Water Issues Study Group. London: SOAS.
Pan, Y. H., Gu, C. J., Ma, J. Z., Zhang, T. S., & Zhang, H. (2014). Water Poverty Index in the Inland River Basins of Hexi Corridor, Gansu Province. In Advanced Materials Research (Vol. 864, pp. 2371-2375).
Pandey VP, Babel MS, Shrestha S, Kazama F (2011a) A framework to assess adaptive capacity of the water resources system in Nepalese river basins. Ecol Indic,11(2):480–488.
Pandey VP, Shrestha S, Chapagain SK, Kazama F (2011b) A framework for measuring groundwater sustainability. Environ Sci Policy, 14:396–407.
Pandey, V. P., Manandhar, S., & Kazama, F. (2012). Water poverty situation of medium-sized river basins in Nepal. Water resources management, 26(9), 2475-2489.
Qiang, F., Kachanoski, G., Dong, L., & Zilong, W. (2008). Evaluation of regional water security using water poverty index. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 1(2), 8-14.
Rosegrant, M. W., Cai, X., & Cline, S. A. (2004). World water and food to 2025: dealing with scarcity. Intl Food Policy Res Inst.
Seckler, D., Amarasinghe, U., Molden, D., de Silva, R., & Barker, R. (1998). World water demand and supply, 1990 to 2025: Scenarios and issues. IWMI Research Report Colombo: International Water Management Institute (IWMI).
Statistical Center of Iran. Yearbook 2017.
Sullivan CA (2002) Calculating a water poverty index. World Dev 30(7):1195–1210.
Sullivan CA, Meigh JR (2003). Considering the Water Poverty Index in the context of poverty alleviation. Water Policy, 5:513–528.
Taheri reykandeh,E.,Salami, H., Yazdani, S. (2016). Investigation the Relationship Between Food Self-Sufficiency and Water Security in Iran. MS.C. dissertation. University of Tehran, Iran.  
Thakur, J. K., Neupane, M., & Mohanan, A. A. (2017). Water poverty in upper Bagmati River basin in Nepal. Water Science, 31(1), 93-108.
Van Ty, T., Sunada, K., Ichikawa, Y., & Oishi, S. (2010). Evaluation of the state of water resources using modified water poverty index: a case study in the Srepok river basin, Vietnam–Cambodia. International Journal of River Basin Management, 8(3-4), 305-317.
Water and Wastewater Company of Iran. Yearbook 2017.
Zhang, R., Duan, Z., Tan, M., & Chen, X. (2012). The assessment of water stress with the Water Poverty Index in the Shiyang River Basin in China. Environmental Earth Sciences67(7), 2155-2160.