ارزیابی شاخص‌های حکمرانی منابع آب زیرزمینی در بخش کشاورزی ایران : کاربرد چارچوب حکمرانی سازمان همکاری و توسعه اقتصادی در دشت همدان ـ بهار

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجو دکتری، گروه توسعه کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه توسعه کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

چکیده

منابع آب زیرزمینی از دیرباز به‌عنوان یکی از منابع حیاتی تأمین آب مصرفی و رفع نیازمندی‌های جوامع بشری مورد توجه بوده است. حکمرانی منابع آب زیرزمینی در بخش کشاورزی از طریق اجماع عوامل دولتی، خصوصی و مردمی درصدد یافتن چالش‌ها و خلاءهای موجود و ارائه راهکارهایی به منظور ارتقا و بهبود شرایط در جهت استفاده پایدار از منابع آب و بخصوص منابع آب زیرزمینی می‌باشد. در این مطالعه به منظور بررسی و ارزیابی حکمرانی منابع آب زیرزمینی دشت همدان ـ بهار از چارچوب حکمرانی منابع آبOECD, 2015 استفاده گردید که شامل 3 بخش اصلی بهره‌وری، اثربخشی، اعتماد و تعامل و 12 رده فرعی می‌باشد. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل 86 نفر از کارشناسان و مسئولان سازمان‌های مرتبط با مسایل آب در بخش کشاورزی بودند. روش جمع‌آوری داده ها با استفاده از روش میدانی و ابزار پرسشنامه انجام پذیرفت و داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار SPSS و 3.Smart PLS مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند. نتایج بر اساس مقادیر اثر F2 نشان داد از میان سازه‌ها، سازه سیاست‌گذاری، بودجه و تامین مالی، اطلاعات و داده به ترتیب با مقادیر 0/422، 356/0 و 326/0 دارای اثر بزرگ بر متغیر مکنون برونزا می‌باشند و سایر سازه‌ها دارای اثر متوسط می‌باشند (اندازه اثر  F2 بین مقادیر 15/0و 35/0 نشان‌دهنده اثر بزرگ می‌باشند). نتیجه برازش‌ مدل ‌کلی بر اساس‌ ‌معیار ‌GOF عدد 29/0 را بدست آمد که نشان از برازش خوب و قابل قبول مدل می‌باشد. همچنین نتایج حاصل از آماره آزمون t و ضرایب مسیر (β) نشان داد که سازه‌های سیاست‌گذاری و اقدامات نوآورانه و بودجه و تامین مالی بیشترین و قویترین تأثیر را بر حکمرانی منابع آب زیرزمینی دشت همدان – بهار دارا می‌باشند. بنابراین، وجود اطلاعات شفاف، دقیق و به موقع در سیاست‌گذاری صحیح منابع آب زیرزمینی باعث تصویب قوانین و اقدامات نوآورانه مناسب و سازگار با شرایط منطقه، جلب مشارکت ذینفعان و به طور کلی، ایجاد یک چرخه حکمرانی مناسب و موثر خواهد شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  1. Batchelor, C. (2009). Water governance literature assessment.Water Alternatives, XXIV(4), 1059–1078.
  1. Becker, j.m., Klein, k.k., Wetzels, m. (2012). Hierarchical Latent Variable Models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for Using Reflective-Formative Type Models. Long Range Planning. 45 , 359-394.
  2. Blomquist, W., &  Schlager ,E .(2008) Embracing watershed politics. University of Colorado Press, Boulder.
  3. Braga, B; Chartres, C; Cosgrove, W. J. da Cunha, L. V; Gleick, P. H; Kabat, P; Ait Kadi, M; Loucks, D. P; Lundqvist, J; Narain, S; and Xia, J. (2014). Water and the Future of Humanity, Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. Springer, Berlin. ISBN 978-3-319-01457-9.
  4. Cadogan, J.W., Lee, N. (2013). Improper Use of Endogenous Formative Variables. Journal of Business Research, in press.
  1. Chin, W.W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly 22 (1), vii-xvi
  2. Choua, S. W., & Chen, P. Y. (2009). The influence of individual differences on continuance  intentions  of  enterprise  resource  planning  (ERP).  Journal Human Computer Studies, 67 (6), 484–496.
  3. Cilliers, P., Biggs, H. C., Blignaut, S., Choles, A. G., Hofmeyr, J. S., Jewitt, G. P. W., & Roux, D. J.(2013). Complexity, modeling, and natural resource management.Ecology and Society, 18(3), 1.
  4. Cohen, J. (1998). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (second edition). Hillsdale, NJ:
    Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  1. Davari, A; Rezazadeh, A. (2014). Modeling structural equations. University Jihad Publications.(In Farsi)
  2. Durán-Sánchez, A., Del Río-Rama, M. D. L., Álvarez-García, J., and Castellano-Álvarez, F. J. (2019). Scientific Coverage in Water Governance: Systematic Analysis. Water, 11 (1), 177. DOI:
  3. Edwards, J.R.(2001). Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: an integrative analytical framework.  Organizational Research Methods 4 (2), 144e192.
  4. Enteshari, S; Safavi, H. R. (2017). Qualitative evaluation of the principles of water governance in Iran with emphasis on the principle of transparency. First Conference on Governance and Public Policy, Tehran. (In Farsi).
  5. FAO. (2015). Shared global vision for Groundwater Governance 2030  and A call-for-action.Pp:1-19.  Shared global vision for Groundwater Governance 2030 and A Call-for-action (fao.org)
  6. Fassihi Harandi, M. (2014). Fuzzy governance of water; Case study of Zayandehrud watershed. Public Policy Studies Network. (In Farsi)
  7. Fornell, C., Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39−50.2 (5),537-558.1–14.
  8. FritzGibbon, J., & Mensah, K. O. (2012). Climate change as a wicked problem. Sage Open, 2,
  9. Gefen, D., Straub, D.W. (2005). A Practical Guide to Factorial Validity Using
    PLS-Graph: Tutorial and Annotated Example. Communications of AIS, 16 (1):
    91-109.
  10. Ghaemi, A., Larijani, M., Shabiri, S. M., and Sarmadi, M. )2017(. Presenting a conceptual model of sustainable governance in the integrated management of the country's water resources with emphasis on education and capacity building. Journal of Water and Wastewater, 4 (28,) 112–117.(In Farsi)
  11. Ghafouri Fard, S., Babaian, F., and Bagheri, A. )2014) Integrated evaluation of water resources system in Rafsanjan area using DPSIR framework and relying on improving the governance system. In the Second National Conference on Water Crisis. Shahrekord: Shahrekord University. (In Farsi)
  12. Green, O., Garmestani, A., van Rijswick, H., and Keessen, A. (2013). EU water governance: striking the right balance between regulatory flexibility and enforcement? Ecology and Society, 18 (2). http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05357-180210
  13. GWP، SESSION CODE: GOVE. )2003(.THE 3RD WORLD WATER FORUM.. ( 1545-1830 ).
  14. Haenlein, M., Kaplan, A. M. (2004). A beginner’s guide to partial least squares analysis,
    Understanding Statistics, 3(4), 283–297.
  15. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., Sartedt, M. (2013). A Primer on Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
  16. Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M. & Mena, J.A., (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414-433.
  1. Harris, L. M., McKenzie, S., Rodina, L., Shah, S. H., Wilson, N. J. (2016). Water justice: Key concepts, debates and research agendas. In R. Hollifield, J. Chakraborty, & G. Walker (Eds.),Handbook of environmental justice. New York, NY: Routledge.
  2. Héritier, A. )2002(..New modes of governance in Europe: policy-making without legislating? In:Héritier, A. (Ed.), Common Goods: Reinventing European and International Governance. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, pp. 185–206
  3. Huntjens, P., Lebel, L., Pahl-Wostl, C., Camkin, J., Schulze, R. Kranz, N. (2012) Institutional design propositions for the governance of adaptation to climate change in the water sector. Global Environmental Change, 22 (2012) 67–81.
  1. Iran Water Management Institute. (2015). Preliminary evaluation of the country's water governance. Tehran. . (In Farsi)
  1. Jakeman, A.J.,Barreteau, O., Hunt, R.J., Rinaudo, J.D., Ross, A. (2016). Integrated Groundwater Management (concept,approaches and challenges). publish Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23576-9
  1. Jarvis, D., MacKenzie, S., Podsakoff, P. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement
    model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research.30(3),199-218.
  2. Johnson, R.E., Rosen, C.C., Chang, C.-H., Djurdjevic, E., Taing, M.U. (2012). Recommendations for improving the construct clarity of higher-order multidimensional constructs. Human Resource Management Review .22 (2), 62-72.
  3. Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee, R. (2009). Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem.Marine Policy, 33, 553–560.
  4. Kabiri, A. (2011). Sociological explanation of good governance. PhD Thesis in Sociology. Tehran, Tarbiat Modares University.(In Farsi)
  5. Karamoz, A., Fattahi, A., Fehresti sani, M., Neshat, A. (2018). Estimation of economic and environmental consequences of groundwater abstraction (Case study: Ardakan city). . Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research. Volume 49, Number 2, Summer 1397, pp. 203-213.
  1. Labajos, R, Alier, M (2015) Political ecology of water conflicts, WIREs Water.
  2. Lu, X.S., Liu, T.L., Huang, H.J., 2015. Pricing and mode choice based on nested logit model
    with trip-chain costs. Transp. Policy 44, 76–88.
  1. Luker, E. (2017). Transitioning towards water supply diversification : possibilities for groundwater in Cape Town, South Africa (T). University of British Columbia. Retrieved from https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0354496
  1. MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M., Podsakoff, N.P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures
    in mis and behavioral research: integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly 35 (2), 293-
  2. Manuel, J; Francisco, J. and Félix, A. (2009). "Exploring The Impact of Individualism
    And Uncertainty Avoidance in Web-Based Electronic Learning: An Empirical Analysis
    in European Higher Education", Computers & Education, 52, pp. 588- 598.
  3. Metz, F., & Ingold, K. (2014). Sustainable wastewater management: Is it possible to regulate micropollution in the future by learning from the past? A policy analysis.Sustainability, 6(4),1992–2012.
  1. Mirnazami, S. J., Bagheri, A. (2017). Evaluation of water governance system for groundwater saving in Iran. Iranian Journal of Water Resources Research. Volume 13, Number 2, p: 32 55. (In Farsi)
  1. Moench, M. (2004). Groundwater: the challenge of monitoring and management. In: Gleick P (ed) The world’s water; the Biennial report on the world’s water resources 2004–05. Island Press, Washington.
  1. Moghimi Benhangi, S; Bagheri, A; Abul Hassani, L. (2018). Evaluation of the official Iranian water institution corresponding to the mechanisms governing the formation of water demand in the agricultural sector from the perspective of social learning framework. Water resources research. Fourteenth Year, No. 1, pp. 159-140. (In Farsi)
  1. Nabhani, L., Omani, A., Noorullah, A. (2017). Favorable characteristics of organizations supporting training in sustainable management of water resources in the groves of Khuzestan province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research. Volume 48, Number 3, October 2017, pp. 519-531.
  1. OECD, (2018a). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD Water Governance Indicator Framework 2018. Available online: http://www.oecd.org/regional/OECD-Water-Governance-Indicator-Framework.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2018).
  1. OECD,(2012). Water Governance in OECD Countries: A Multi-level Approach.
  2. OECD,(2018b) . Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD Council Recommendation on Water. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/environment/resources/Council-Recommendation-on pdf(accessed on 25 November 2018).
  3. (2015).Principles on water governance. OECD Water Governance Programme. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/governance/oecdprinciples-on-water-governance.htm#Principles.
  4. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD Principles on Water Governance. (2019).Available online: http://www.oecd.org/governance/oecd-principles-on-water-governance.htm (accessed on 1 September 2017).
  5. Ostrom E, Gardner R, Walker J. (1994). Rules, games and common-pool resources. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
  6. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  7. Pahl-Wostl, C., Lebel, L., Knieper, C., Nikitina, E. (2012). From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: Towards adaptive water governance in river basins. Environmental Science &Policy, 23,24–34.
  8. Patterson, J. J., Smith, C., & Bellamy, J. (2013). Understanding enabling capacities for managing the ‘wicked problem’ of nonpoint source water pollution in catchments: A conceptual framework.Journal of Environmental Management, 128, 441–452.
  9. Pedregal, B, Cabello, V, Hernández Mora, N, Limones, N, Del Moral, L. (2015). Information and  knowledge  for  water  governance  in  the  networked  society,  Water Alternatives, 8(2), 1-19.
  10. Peters, G. B. (2017). What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program.Policy and Society, 36(3), 385–396.
  11. Petter, S., Straub, D., Rai, A. (2007). Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 31 (1), 623-656.
  12. Polites, G.L., Roberts, N., Thatcher, J. (2012). Conceptualizing models using multidimensional constructs: a review and guidelines for their use. European Journal of Information Systems 21 (1), 22-48.
  13. Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., Straub, D.W., 2012. Editor’s comments: a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in
    MIS quarterly. MIS Quarterly 36 (1), iii-xiv.
  14. Sabrina Kirschke, Christian Franke, Jens Newig & Dietrich Borchardt. (2019). Clusters of water governance problems and their effects on policy delivery, Policy and Society, 38:2, 255-277, DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2019.1586081
  15. Salari, F., Ghorbani, M., and Malekian, A. (2015) .Social monitoring of the network of stakeholders in water governance. Rangeland and Watershed Management, Journal of Natural Resources iran. Pp:305–287 ,(2)68. (In Farsi)
  16. Schlager, E. (2007). Community management ofgroundwater. In: Giordano M, Villholth K (eds) The agricultural groundwater revolution: opportunities and threats to development. CABI Publishing, Wallingford.
  17. Silva, A C  S, Galvão, C O, Silva, G N S. (2015).  Droughts and governance impacts  on  water  scarcity:  an  analysis  in  the  Brazilian  semi -arid,  Copernicus Publications on behalf of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences, IAHS, 369, 129–134.
  18. Sternlieb, F, Laituri, M .(2015). Spatialising agricultural water governance data in polycentric regimes, Water Alternatives, 8(2), 36-56.
  19. Tortajada, C. (2010).Water governance: some critical issues. Water Resources Development vol. 26(2), pp. 297–307.
  1. Transparency for Iran. (2018). https://tp4.ir/703
  2. Turrini. A., Cristofoli, D., Frosoni, F., and Nasi, G. (2010). Networking literature about determinants of network effectiveness. Public Administration, 88: 528-550.
  3. UNDP. (2013) .Characteristics of Good governance. The Urban Governance initiative TUGi.
  4. UN-Water . (2009).  Water  in  A  Changing  World,  World  Water  Assessment Programme, The United Nations World Water Development, Report 3.
  5. USAID. (2010)."MENA Regional Water Governance Benchmarking Project/Concept and Approach Framework".
  6. Vahid, M, Akhavan, S. (2018). A Comparative Study of the Performance of the Eighth and Ninth Governments in the Islamic Republic of Iran with Emphasis on Water Resources Policy; Case study: The crisis of water resources in Isfahan province, Quarterly Journal of Public Policy, Volume 9, Number 1, pp. 239-121. (In Farsi).
  7. Venkatraman, N. (1989). Strategic orientation of business enterprises: the construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science 35 (8), 942-962.
  1. Vinzi, V. E., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (2010). Handbook of
    Partial Leastmquares, Springer, Germany: Berlin.
  2. Wen, l., li, z. (2019). Driving forces of national and regional CO2 emissions in China combined IPAT-E and PLS-SEM model. Science of the Total Environment. 690 ,237–247
  1. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schroder, G., van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly 33 (1), 177-195.
  1. Wijnen M., Augeard, M., Hiller, B., Ward, C., Huntjens, P. (2012) Managing the invisible: understanding and improving groundwater governance. World Bank, Washington, DC.
  2. Wong, k.k. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Techniques Using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24, Technical Note 1.1-32.
  3. Yilagh Choghakhor, H., Karami, A.(2019). Evaluating the efficiency of irrigation and agriculture management of aqueduct organizations in Khuzestan province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research. Volume 5, Number 3, pp:515-530.
  4. Zhang, H. Y., Shi, Z. H., Fang, N. F., & Guo, M. H. (2015).Linking watershed geomorphic characteristics tosediment yield: Evidence from the Loess Plateau of China.Geomorphology, 234,1.

Ziervogel, G., Pelling, M., Cartwright, A., Chu, E., Deshpande, T., Harris, L.,…Zweig, P. (2017). Inserting rights and justice into urban resilience:A focus on everyday risk.Environment and Urbanization, 29(1), 123–138.

تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران
دوره 52، شماره 3
مهر 1400
صفحه 591-615

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار