تحلیل شبکه سیاست گذاری در مدیریت مشارکتی منابع طبیعی (مطالعه موردی حوزه آبخیز حبله رود)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه آموزش و ترویج دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

2 گروه آموزش و ترویج دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.

چکیده

مدیریت منابع طبیعی در ایران از یک ساختار سلسله مراتبی تبعیت می کند که دارای مقیاس های متفاوتی در سطوح مختلف می باشد و در هر سطح دست اندرکاران مختلفی نقش آفرین می باشند.در راستای  دستیابی به مدیریت مشارکتی سازگار کلیه دست اندرکاران سازمانی ضروریست به میزان انسجام  موجود سازمانی و تحلیل دقیق از شبکه سیاست گذاری در مدیریت مشارکتی منابع طبیعی دست یابیم.
این تحقیق با استفاده از رویکرد تحلیل شبکه های اجتماعی(SNA) به تحلیل انسجام سازمانی وشبکه سیاست گذاری در مدیریت مشارکتی منابع طبیعی برای ۳۷ نهاد مرتبط با مدیریت مشارکتی منابع طبیعی در حوزه آبخیز حبله رود پرداخته است. نتایج نشان از آن داشت که مرکزیت بینابینی چهار نهاد سازمان جنگها، مراتع و آبخیزداری کشور ،حفاظت از محیط زیست، وزارت جهاد کشاورزی، وزارت کشور دارای قدرت کنترل و واسطه گری بالا می باشد. با توجه به نقش کلیدی نهاد هایی چون سازمان های مردم نهاد در امر آموزش، آگاهی و توانمند سازی جامعه محلی این مسئله از چالش های مهم پیش روی دستیابی به مدیریت مشارکتی در حوزه آبخیز حبله رود می باشد. همچنین نهادهایی مانند وزارت تعاون،کار و رفاه اجتماعی، باید دارای تعامل و ارتباط بالاتری با سایر سازمان های مرتبط در این زمینه باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


Extended Abstract

Objectives

   Natural resource management in Iran follows a hierarchical structure that has different scales at different levels and at each level different actors are involved. In order to achieve consistent participatory management, all organizational actors need coherence. Achieve organizational balance and careful analysis of the policy network in participatory natural resource management. The subject of the analysis of the participatory network of participatory management of natural resources is to strengthen coordination and outsourcing policies between different organizations related to the Hablehroud watershed, which is jointly located in the two provinces of Tehran and Semnan, so the purpose of this research is to analyze the participatory network between these organizationes. The continuation of the process of destruction of natural resources, the importance of the participatory management approach in the process of decision-making, policy-making and implementation of natural resources projects, the recognition of challenges and opportunities in the policy-making and planning of sustainable management of these resources, the need to recognize all the actors in the organizational and institutional network. It makes natural resources more visible for sustainable management.

 

Methods

    The present study used applied and developmental research which is descriptive-analytical and has focused on the role of the network of institutional stakeholders in the participatory management of natural resources. Therefore, based on the definition of interactive-participatory decision-making network for use in open policymaking with a transdisciplinary approach, the roles and functions of promoting the sustainable development of natural resources and the country's environment have been examined by specialized organizations as a basic strategy. (SNA) Social networking analysis approach, this study analysis organizational cohesion and policy network in participatory natural resource management for 37 institutions related to participatory natural resource management in Hablehroud watershed.

 

Results

    The results showed that the intermediate centrality of the four institutions of the Organization of Wars, Rangelands and Watershed Management, Environmental Protection, Ministry of Jihad Agriculture, Ministry of Interior has high control and mediation power. Given the key role of institutions such as NGOs in educating, raising awareness and empowering the local community, this is one of the major challenges facing achieving participatory management in the Hableh River watershed. Institutions such as the Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor and Social Welfare should also have higher interaction and communication with other related organizations in this field.

 

Discussion

   The present research showed that for participatory management in which various organizational stakeholders are involved, as the first step in any executive activity, it should be noted that there is no ideal network structure that is compatible with all social and political conditions and processes in the field. There is no land governance. Therefore, taking into account the fact that without conducting research of this kind and without detailed monitoring, it is not possible to achieve participatory management in accordance with local adaptation and sustainable development. Therefore, it is necessary to first study the related networks and the pattern of their outsourcing relationships. And after discovering the challenges and problems, the necessary strategies and policies should be developed.

Finally, it should be stated that due to the critical condition of the country's natural resources and the comprehensive destruction caused by human activities and improper management actions, the need and necessity of a comprehensive look at the issues and problems facing the adaptive participatory management is felt more than ever. Also, in this regard, it is necessary to continuously present the process of changes in cohesion, organizational capital, changes in stability and adaptability of the network, and in this way, it enables planners and managers to develop executive plans with a comprehensive view based on scientific principles. To work towards participatory management.

Alexander, S. and Armitage, D., 2015. A social relational network perspective for MPA science. Conserv., Lett. 8 (1), 1–.31
 Armitage,        D.F.,     Berkes,N.         and       Doubleday.,2007. Adaptive Co-management:
Bastani, S., & Raissi, M. (2012). Social Network Analysis as a Method: Using Whole Network Approach for Studying FOSS Communities. Journal of Iranian Social Studies, 5(2), 31-57.
Berkes, F., 2010. Devolution of environment and resources governance: trends and
Bodin, Ö. and Crona, B., 2009. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference?, Journal of Global Environmental Change, 19, 366-.473
Bodin, O. and Prell, C., 2011. Social network in natural resources management, Cambridge University press.
Bodin, Ö., Crona, B. and Ernstson, H., 2006. Social networks in natural resource management – What’s there to learn from a structural perspective? , Ecology & Society, 11 (2).
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. and Freeman, L. C., 2002. UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis, Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
Collaboration, Learning, and Multi-level GovernanceUniversity of British Columbia Press, 344 p.
Crona, B. I. and O. Bodin., 2006. What you know is who you know? Patterns of communication as prerequisites for co-management, Ecology and Society, 11(2), art7.
Eszter Kovacs ., Orsolya M, Veronika F,d, Katalin M.,e, Agnes K Veronika.,K, Anita .N ., Grecsb, Andras B, Barbara M.2021.Fostering adaptive co-management with stakeholder participation in the surroundings of soda pans in Kiskunság, Hungary – An assessment, Journal of Land Use Policy
future, Environ Conserv, 37, 489e500.
Ghorbani M, Ebrahimi F, Salajegheh A, Mohseni_saravi M. 2014. Social Network Analysis of Local Stakeholders in Action Plan for Water Resources Co-Management(Case study: Jajrood River in Latian watershed, Darbandsar village). jwmseir 2014; 8 (25) :47-56
Ghorbani, M. 2014. Report on the project of the Iranian model of participation and empowerment of local communities with a social network approach, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, 245 pages.
Ghorbani, M., & Dehbozorgi, M. 2014. Stakeholders’ Analysis, Social Power and Network Analysis in Natural Resources Co-Management. Journal of Range and Watershed Managment, 67(1), 141-157. doi: 10.22059/jrwm.2014.50835.
Ghorbani, M., 2014. Report of the National Social Network Analysis Project; Modeling, policy-making and implementation of participatory management of natural resources (first phase), Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, 236 pages.
Ghorbani, M., Azarnivand, H., Mehrabi, A., Bastani, S., Jafari, M., & Nayebi, H. 2012. Social network analysis: A new approach in policy-making and planning of natural resources co-management. Journal of Range and Watershed Managment, 65(4), 553-568. doi: 10.22059/jrwm.2012.32053
Ghorbani, M., Hadarbadi, G., Ebrahimi Azarkharan, F., & Khavar, A. 2016. Network Analysis and Appraisal of Social Capital of Beneficiaries for Rural Sustainable Development (Case Study: Bazijan Village, Mahalat County, Markazi Province). Journal of Rural Research, 7(2), 406-421.
Ghorbani, M., Rasakhi, S., Motavali H., and Avazpour, L. 2016. Analysis of Organizational Cohesion and Detection of key actors in the Sustainable Landscape management. Researches in Earth Sciences, 7(4), 119-138.
Hablehroud watershed Water and Soil Sustainable Management Plan Secretariat. 2017, Habale Rood Sustainable Water and Soil Management Plan Report. Iranian Forests and Ranges Organization. Tehran.
Hanneman, R. A. and Riddle, M., 2005. Introduction to social network methods, University of California Riverside, California.
Hanneman, R. A., 2001. Introduction to Social Network Methods, University of California, Riverside, California.
 Holling, C S .,1973. Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems, Ann, Rev. Ecol, Syst., 4, 1
Kangarani, H. 2012. An introduction to network analysis and its applications in management and policy-making of natural resources (study of fourth development plan)., 1(1), 79-92.
Kendrick, A., 2003. Caribou co-management in northern Canada: fostering multiple ways of knowing. Journal of Ecological Indicators, 17, 241-267.
Lienert, J., Schnetzer, F. and Ingold, K., 2013. Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes, Journal of Environmental Management, 125, 134-.841
 Lucas Phillip Creviera2019. Synergy between adaptive management and participatory modelling: The two processes as interconnected spirals two processes as interconnected spirals, Journal Ecological Informatics 53.
Mitchell,t. and Harris, K., 2012. Resilience: A risk management approach.background note of Overseas Development Institute(odi), January 2012.
Naderi, M., Ghorbani. M. and Yavari, A.2014. Analysis of the information exchange network and key actors in policy making and sustainable management of Sorkheh Hisar National Park (2014). . Researches in Earth Sciences, 5(4), 16-28.
Nunan, F., Hara, M. and Onyango, P., 2015. Institutions and co-management in East African Inland and Malawi fisheries: a critical perspective, World Dev, 70, 203– 214.
 Ostrom E. 1990: Governing the commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E., 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Ostrom, E., 2009, A general framework for analyzing sustainability of socialecological systems. Science 325, 419e422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science.1172133
Pomeroy, R., McConney, P. and Mahon, R., 2004. Comparative analysis of coastal resource co-management in the Caribbean, Ocean Coastal Manage, 47, 429–.744
Rasakhi, S., 2014. Analysis of social networks in policy-making, planning and participatory management of pastures (a case study of Qasr Yaqoub village, Safa Shahr city), Ph.D. thesis, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Science and Research Unit.
Salari, F., Ghorbani, M., & Malekian, A. 2015. Social Monitoring in Local Stakeholders Network to Water Resources Local Governance (Case Study: Razin Watershed, Kermanshah City). Journal of Range and Watershed Managment, 68(2), 287-305. doi: 10.22059/jrwm.2015.54931