Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Molasani, Iran.
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran.
3 Agricultural Education and Extension Institute, Agricultural Extension, Education and Research Organization, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Keywords
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Agricultural production is among the most risky economic activities, in which various economic, social, natural, and personal risks have created a vulnerable environment for producers. Due to the special nature of its products, the livestock sub-sector is associated with more risks, and therefore reducing the effects of these risks should be at the center of policy makers' decisions. One of the most important policies in this regard, which is supported by experts, is livestock insurance. One of the most important aspects of this policy is its acceptance by the stakeholders. The present study aims to determine the factors affecting the acceptance of livestock insurance by the nomadic households in Khuzestan province.
Material and Methods
To investigate factors affecting the acceptance of animal insurance by Nomad housholds in Khuzestan province, a binary probit model was estimated. To estimate binary choice models in previous studies, the maximum likelihood method has been used. This method is a frequentist approach that relies on asymptotic assumptions. In other words, the estimates obtained from this method are only reliable in large samples. In the present syudy to estimate probit model, the Metropolis-Hastings of Markov Chain Monte Carlo, which is one of the Bayesian econometric estimators was used. The necessary data were collected by completing questionnaires from 127 nomadic households that were randomly selected.
Results and discussion
The results showed that variables such as the occurrence of damage, receipt of compensation, number of livestock, and access to the internet positively affect the probability of livestock insurance acceptance by nomadic households, while the age of the household head has a negative effect. In this context, the amount of compensation received has the highest marginal effect on insurance acceptance, approximately 9%. Following this, the dummy variables include the occurrence of damage and internet access each have a marginal effect of about 3%. Since the policyholder must deliver the head of the livestock to the insurance company to prove the occurrence of damage, based on the study results, it is suggested that the insurance company relax this strict policy of proving damage and show more flexibility by using other tools, especially by placing more trust in Nomadic households when paying compensation. Additionally, by providing necessary training, especially for the elderly, their participation in the insurance process should be increased..
All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization of the article and writing of the original and subsequent drafts.
If the study did not report any data, you might add “Not applicable” here.
The authors would like to thank all participants of the present study.
The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct.
The author declares no conflict of interest.
The author declares no conflict of interest.