Factors Affecting Livestock Insurance in Nomadic Households of Khuzestan Province: Application of Bayesian Econometrics

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Molasani, Iran.

2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran.

3 Agricultural Education and Extension Institute, Agricultural Extension, Education and Research Organization, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The livestock subsector, due to the specific nature of its products, is accompanied by numerous risks. Therefore, mitigating these risks should be at the center of policymakers’ decision-making. One of the most important policies in this regard, which is also supported by experts, is livestock insurance. A crucial aspect of this policy is its acceptance by stakeholders. This study aims to identify the factors influencing the acceptance of livestock insurance by nomadic households in Khuzestan Province. To this end, a binary probit model was estimated using the Metropolis-Hastings Markov Chain Monte Carlo estimator, which is one of the Bayesian econometric estimators. The necessary data were collected through questionnaires completed by 127 randomly selected nomadic households in 2024. The results showed that variables such as the incidence of damage, receipt of compensation, number of livestock, and internet access positively influence the probability of livestock insurance acceptance by nomadic households, while the age of the household head has a negative impact. Since proving the occurrence of damage requires the policyholder to deliver the head of the deceased livestock to the insurance company, the study suggests that the insurance company should relax this strict policy and show more flexibility in paying compensation by using other tools and, above all, by placing more trust in nomadic households. Additionally, providing necessary training, especially for the elderly, can increase their participation in the insurance process.

Keywords


Extended Abstract

Introduction

    Agricultural production is among the most risky economic activities, in which various economic, social, natural, and personal risks have created a vulnerable environment for producers. Due to the special nature of its products, the livestock sub-sector is associated with more risks, and therefore reducing the effects of these risks should be at the center of policy makers' decisions. One of the most important policies in this regard, which is supported by experts, is livestock insurance. One of the most important aspects of this policy is its acceptance by the stakeholders. The present study aims to determine the factors affecting the acceptance of livestock insurance by the nomadic households in Khuzestan province.

 

Material and Methods

    To investigate factors affecting the acceptance of animal insurance by Nomad housholds in Khuzestan province, a binary probit model was estimated. To estimate binary choice models in previous studies, the maximum likelihood method has been used. This method is a frequentist approach that relies on asymptotic assumptions. In other words, the estimates obtained from this method are only reliable in large samples. In the present syudy to estimate probit model, the Metropolis-Hastings of Markov Chain Monte Carlo, which is one of the Bayesian econometric estimators was used. The necessary data were collected by completing questionnaires from 127 nomadic households that were randomly selected.

 

Results and discussion

   The results showed that variables such as the occurrence of damage, receipt of compensation, number of livestock, and access to the internet positively affect the probability of livestock insurance acceptance by nomadic households, while the age of the household head has a negative effect. In this context, the amount of compensation received has the highest marginal effect on insurance acceptance, approximately 9%. Following this, the dummy variables include the occurrence of damage and internet access each have a marginal effect of about 3%. Since the policyholder must deliver the head of the livestock to the insurance company to prove the occurrence of damage, based on the study results, it is suggested that the insurance company relax this strict policy of proving damage and show more flexibility by using other tools, especially by placing more trust in Nomadic households when paying compensation. Additionally, by providing necessary training, especially for the elderly, their participation in the insurance process should be increased..

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization of the article and writing of the original and subsequent drafts.

Data Availability Statement

If the study did not report any data, you might add “Not applicable” here.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants of the present study.

Ethical considerations

The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

 

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

 

REFERENCES
Agricultural insurance fund (2019). Insurance and agriculture. Agricultural Insurance Fund Research Quarterly, 58, 40-53.
Agricultural statistics (2022). Second volume, Vice President of Statistics, Center for Statistics, Communication Technology. https://ajkhz.ir/main/index.php/download/aj2-1401.pdf
Bertram-Huemmer, V. and Kraehnet, K. (2018). Does index insurance help households recover from disaster? evidence from IBLI Mongolia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 100(1), 145-171.
Boyer, C. R., DeLong K. L., Griffith, A. P., and Martinez, C. C. (2024). Factors influencing United States cattle producers use of livestock risk protection. Agricultural Economics, 55, 677-689.
Cakmakyapana, S. and Goktasb, A. (2013). A comparison of binary logit and probit models with simulation study. Journal of Social and Economic Statistics, 2(1), 1-17.
Dong, H., Jimoh, S. O., Hou, Y., and Hou, X. (2020). Willingness to pay for livestock husbandry insurance: An empirical analysis of grassland farms in Inner Mongolia, China. Sustainability, 12 (18), 7331.
Emvalomatis, G. (2020). Bayesian econometrics using BayES, Creative Commons Attribution, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Foladizada, M., Barani, H., Abedi Sarvestani, A., and Mostafaloo, H. (2017). Socio-economic factors affecting acceptance of livestock and rangelands insurance (Case study: Agh Ghala county, Golestan Province, Iran. Journal of Rangeland Science, 7(1), 35-44.
Fort, H., Dieguez, F., Halty, V., and Lima, J. M. S. (2017). Two examples of application of ecological modeling to agricultural production: Extensive livestock farming and overyielding in grassland mixtures. Ecological Modelling, 357, 23-34.
Fouladi, H., & Tarazkar, M. H. (2023). Economic and social factors affecting the adoption of compulsory small ruminant insurance in Ahwaz County. Journal of Animal Researcch (Agriculturl Sciences), 33(3), 45-57.
Ghahremanzadeh, M., Dashti, G., Pahlevani, R., & Sani, F. (2018). Investigating the effectiveness of government support policies on Total Factor Productivity in rural and pastoral systems of small ruminant husbandry in selected provinces of Iran. Journal of Animal Researcch (Agriculturl Sciences), 28(3), 153-168.
Ghasemian, S., Dourandish, A., Ghorbani, M., & Sakhi, F. (2024). Investigating the factors affecting the decreased demand for insurance of agricultural products (Case study: Wheat farmers of Torbat-Jam City). Rural Development Strategies, 11(1), 96-116.
Green, W. H. (2012), Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall.
Hamedi Oghul Beyke, A. A. and Sabouri, M. S. (2014). Factors associated with acceptance and rejection of rural livestock insurance in Garmsar (Semnan Province). Animal Sciences Journal, 104, 79-90.
Hastings, W. K. (1970). Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika, 57(1), 97-109.
Hayati, E. (2001). A perspective on the tomorrow of nomadic life. In Proceedings of the nomadic life development strategy conference, the role of expression, Nomadic affairs organization of Iran, Tehran,(In farsi).
Hayati, B., Ghahremanzadeh, M., Khodaverdizadeh, M., and Najafi, N. (2010). Investigating effective factors on adoption of native livestock insurance in Salmas County. Journal of Animal Science Researches20(2), 27-38.
Hosseinnejad Mir, N., Gholamrezai, S., Rahimian, M., and Rahmani Karchegani, M. (2019). Exploring the solutionsof agricultural insurance development in Iran. Village and Development22(1), 71-86.
Huber, C. (2019). Introduction to bayesian analysis using Stata, Indian University of Bloomington. https://media.dlib.indiana.edu/media_objects/z890s113p
 Iran Data Administration (Irda) (2022). The amount of livestock of the country's nomads, https://irda.ir/Categories/Detail/Tribes_13
Khodaverdizadeh, M., Khodaverdizadeh, S., and Masoomzadeh, F. (2014). Determining effective factors on demand for rural livestock insurance (Case study: Marand Township). Rural Development Strategies1(3),1-18.
Koop, G. (2003), Bayesian Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England
Kyire, S. K. C., Kuwornu, J. K. M., Bannor, R. K., Apiors, E. K. and Martey, E. (2023). Perceived risk and risk management strategies under irrigated rice farming: Evidence from Tono and Vea irrigation schemes-Northern Ghana. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 12, 100593.
 Lancaster, T. (2004), An introduction to modern bayesian econometrics, Oxford, UK: WileyBlackwell.
Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Advanced quantitative techniques in the social sciences, 7.
Majedi, M., Naderi, K. & Saadi, H. (2016). Wheat insurance development barriers in Asadabad county. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research47(1), 57-66.
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953). Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. Journal of Chemical Physics, 21(6), 1087–1092.
Mirzaei A., Abdeshahi A., and Azarm H. (2023). The effect of price surging of livestock products on the rangeland and the livelihood of nomads. Mamasani rangelands, 17(3), 426-446.
Naderi, K., Yaghoubi Farani, A., Saadi, H., & Zoleikhaei Sayar, L. (2014). Factors affecting the development of wheat farming insurance in Hamedan County. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research45(3), 25-437.
Nasrnia, F., & Shokoohi, Z. (2022). Investigating The Effect of C Settlement on Livelihood Resilience of Nomadic Families in Fasa City. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics & Development Research (IJAEDR)53(3).
Pishbahar, E., Abedi, S., Dashti, G., and Kianirad, A. (2015). Weather-based crop insurance (WBCI) premium for rainfed wheat in Miyaneh county: D-Vine copula approach application. Agricultural Economics, 9(3), 37-62.
Singh, S., Kumar, A. and Arora, K., (2022). Adoption of livestock insurance in Punjub: Extent and constraints. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 75(3), 278-284. 
Stata Publication (2023), Stata Bayesian model averaging referencesmanual release 18,SatatCrop, College Station, Texas. 
Subedi, S. and Kattel, R. R. (2022). Determining factors and impact of household income on dairy cattle insurance in Nepal. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry University, 5, 229-238.
Ye, T., Li, Y., Gao, Y., and Yi, M. (2017). Designing index-based livestock insurance for managing snow disaster risk in Eastern Inner Mongolia, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 23, 160-168.
Yufei, G. Arshad, M. U. Xinya, G., and Yuanfeng, Z. (2022). An empirical study of key factors affecting herders’ purchasing decision on weather index insurance- A case study from inner Mongolia autonomous region, China. Heliyon, 8(11), 1-7.
Zare Mehrjerdi, M. R., and Esmaieli, A. (2010). Determination of effective factors on adoption of livestock insurance in Kerman with parametric and nonparametric methods. Agricultural Economics Research2(7), 1-19.