The factors affecting the acceptance of mechanical and non-mechanical methods of water and soil conservation by farmers of Hamedan-Bahar plain (application of the multinominal logit model)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran

2 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran.

Abstract

Destruction of basic agricultural resources is one of the biggest challenges facing sustainable food security. The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors influencing the adoption of mechanical and non-mechanical methods of soil and water resources conservation in Hamedan-Bahar plain. The data of this study was obtained by completing the questionnaire and interviewing 191 farmers in the crop year of 2021-2022. For data analysis, general logit and multinominal logit models were used. The results of this study showed that the factors affecting the acceptance of non-mechanical and mechanical conservation methods can be statistically separated from each other. The variables of having a non-agricultural job, the value of each hectare of land, the commitment to preserve basic resources for the future generation on the probability of accepting non- mechanical methods, and the variables of the value of each hectare of land, the amount of credits received, knowledge of the long-term benefits of conservation agriculture, the commitment to preserve basic resources for The future generation and lack of trust in the advice of agricultural experts have significant effect on the probability of acceptance of mechanical protection methods by farmers. According to the results, measures such as granting long-term, low-interest and targeted facilities for the use of protective measures, increasing educational-promotional activities by the provincial agricultural organization, using public media and virtual networks to inform farmers, creating non-agricultural job fields and diversification of the economic sector in rural areas is one of the proposed policies effective on the acceptance of conservation cultivation methods.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Extended Abstract

Objectives

The trend of growing population and the consequent need for more food, and the limitation of water and soil resources, on the other hand, have made the optimal management of basic agricultural resources a necessary issue. Meanwhile, one of the duties of the policy maker in the field of agriculture, in addition to ensuring food security, is to protect basic resources for the sustainable production of agricultural and food products. It is for this reason that the issue of sustainable agriculture has attracted the attention of policymakers who, in addition to maintaining production in the long term, emphasize on preventing the destruction of natural resources and the environment. During the last decades, the continuous development of industrial activities and excessive consumption of chemical fertilizers and poisons in order to increase the production of agricultural products has led to the pollution of a large volume of surface and underground water sources. On the other hand, the decrease in rainfall caused by climate change has led to successive droughts. On the other hand, there are droughts, torrential rains, heavy damages and the impossibility of using water sources. Droughts and torrential rains are two aspects of the resource shortage crisis. Watershed measures and mechanical protection methods are among the measures that can prevent floods and preserve precious and scarce water resources and help feed underground aquifers. Various studies have been conducted regarding the factors influencing the acceptance of conservation cultivation measures. Reviewing the literature on the subject shows that individual characteristics influence the acceptance of water and soil conservation measures, but similar or sometimes different results have been obtained depending on the demographic, regional, and climatic characteristics of basic resources. Also, some conservation agriculture practices have been emphasized in various studies. In this study, it is tried to analyze all conservation measures, both mechanical and non-mechanical, and to identify the factors influencing the acceptance of conservation measures by separating mechanical and non-mechanical methods, so that the policy maker can promote the desired method according to the needs of each region.

 

Methods

According to the aim of the present study, the adoption of conservation methods from the basic water and soil resources is a dependent variable that the effect of the effective factors on it is investigated. Due to the two-dimensional nature of the dependent variable (acceptance and non-acceptance), a special type of statistical model is used to estimate the relevant regression, including logit and probit models. In models where the dependent variable and sometimes the independent variables are fictitious and ranked, normal distribution cannot be observed, and for this reason models such as logit and probit are used. Meanwhile, the logit model has been widely used in various studies due to its simplicity. After estimating the logit model of acceptance of conservation cultivation method by farmers, the Multinominal Logit Model (MNL) was used to investigate the factors influencing the acceptance of mechanical and non-mechanical methods of protecting water and soil resources at the farm level. This model, which is one of the econometric methods, is used to estimate multivariate regression functions. The advantage of using multinominal logit is that it allows the analysis of decisions in more than two groups and obtains the probability of accepting the desired event in different groups.

 

Results

The results of logit model estimation show that the “age” variable does not have a significant effect on the adoption of conservation cultivation. The virtual variable of “having a non-agricultural job” shows that the probability of accepting conservation methods is higher for people who have other jobs besides agriculture. The variables of the “value of each hectare of land”, “the distance from the farm to the residence”, “the amount of received credits”, “the amount of soil erosion”, "awareness of the long-term benefits of conservation cultivation" and "commitment to the preservation of basic resources for the future generation" are significant with a positive sign, as expected. Also, the attitudinal variable "lack of trust in agricultural experts regarding the long-term benefits of conservation cultivation" has become significant with a sign in accordance with the expectation and at the 1% level, which shows that distrust towards agricultural experts has a negative effect on the acceptance of conservation cultivation practices. The results of the multinominal logit model estimation show that the variables of “age”, “number of plots of land”, “the distance from the farm to the residence”, “the presence of sufficient labor for conservation measures”, none of them have an effect on increasing the probability of accepting mechanical and non-mechanical methods compared to the basic strategy. The variables of the “value of each hectare of land” and the “amount of the credits received” increase the probability of being in two groups of farmers who accepted mechanical and non-mechanical conservation methods, although the effect of these two variables on the acceptance of non-mechanical methods by the farmer is stronger. The variables of having a “non-agricultural job” and “intensifying soil erosion” increase the probability of accepting non-mechanical methods compared to accepting the basic strategy, and in contrast to the variable of “not trusting agricultural experts regarding the long-term benefits of conservation cultivation”, it decreases the probability of accepting non-mechanical conservation methods. Improvement in the variables of “knowledge of the long-term benefits of conservation agriculture” and “commitment to the preservation of basic resources for the future generation”, leads to an increase in the probability of adopting mechanical conservation methods compared to the basic strategy.

 

Discussion

The results of this study show that there is a difference between the factors affecting the acceptance of two groups of protective measures, i.e. non-mechanical measures and mechanical measures. Therefore, depending on the characteristics of each region, the condition of the basic sources and the characteristics of the farming community, different policies can be adopted based on the type of protective measures. Based on the results, in order to encourage farmers to use the methods of protecting water and soil resources, measures such as granting targeted long-term and low-interest credits for the use of protective measures, increasing educational-promotional activities by the Provincial Agricultural Organization, using public media and virtual networks to inform farmers and also create a sense of responsibility towards the future generation, create other job fields and diversify the economic sector in rural and agricultural areas, as well as train knowledgeable and experienced promotional experts for effective and based communication. Trusting with the farming community is one of the policies that are recommended based on the results of this study.

Abdollahzadeh, G., Farahi, N. & Sharifzadeh, M.S. (2017). Factors affecting the adoption of conservation measures in soil erosion control: A case of orchard lands of Chehel-Chay watershed. Journal of Environmental Erosion Research, 7(1), 50-68. (In Persian)
Abedi, S., Yazdani, S., Saleh, I., salami, H. & Jahansuz, M.R. (2014). Analysis of factors affecting adoption of agriculture conservation in Fars provinces. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 45-2(2), 247-255. (In Persian)
Akter, Sh., Gathala, M.K., Timsina, J., Islam, S., Rahman, M., Hassan, M.K. & Ghosh, A.K. (2021). Adoption of conservation agriculture-based tillage practices in the rice-maize systems in Bangladesh. World Development Perspectives, 21, 100297.
Asfaw, D. & Neka, M. (2017). Factors affecting adoption of soil and water conservation practices: The case of Wereillu Woreda (District), South Wollo Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. International Soiland Water Conservation Research, 5, 273-279.
Belayneh, M. (2023). Factors affecting the adoption and effectiveness of soil and water conservation measures among small-holder rural farmers: The case of Gumara watershed. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 18, 200159.
Bikal, K., Jay, D. & Shiva, D. (2015). Level op adoption and factor affecting the level of adoption of sustainable soil management practices in Ramechhhap district, Nepal. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 3(2), 21-24.
Corbeels, M., de Craaff, J., Ndah, T. H., Penot, E., Baudron, F., Naudin, K., Nadine A., Chirat, G., Schuler, J., Nyagumbo, I., Rusinamhodzi, L., Traore, K., Mzoba, H.D. & Adolwa, I.S. (2014). Understanding the impact and adoption of conservation agriculture in Africa: A multi-scale analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 187(C): 155-70.
D’Souza, A. & Ashok, K.M. (2018). Adoption and abandonment of partial conservation technologies in developing economies: The case of South Asia. Land Use Policy, 70(C), 212-223.
Darkwah, K.A., Kwawu, J.D., Agyire-Tettey, F. & Sarpong, D.B. (2019). Assessment of the determinants that influence the adoption of sustainable soil and water conservation practices in Techiman Municipality of Ghana. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 7(3), 248-257.
Derajew, F., Bekabil, F. & Wagayehu, B., (2013). Determinants of the use of soil conservation technological small holder farmers: The case of Hulet Eju Enesie district, east Gojjam zone, Ethiopia. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Food Science, 24, 123-139.
Erfanifar, S. Zibaei, M. & Kasraei, M. (2014). Identifying socioeconomic factors affecting the adoption of modern conservation tillage technologies in Darab region (Multinomial logit model approach). Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 28(3), 197-203. (In Persian)
Fantappiè, M., Lorenzetti, R., De Meo, I. & Costantini, E.A.C. (2020). How to improve the adoption of soil conservation practices? Suggestions from farmers' perception in western Sicily. Journal of Rural Studies, 73, 186-202.
Fikru, A. (2009). Assessment of adoption of soil and water conservation practice in Koga watershed, high lands of Ethiopia. Unpublished Master Thesis, Faculty of Graduate School, Cornell University, Ithaca, US.
Gathala, M. K., Jat, M. L., Saharawat, Y. S., Sharma, S. K., Singh, Y. & Ladha, J. K. (2017). Physical and chemical properties of a sandy loam soil under irrigated rice-wheat sequence in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of South Asia. Journal of Ecosystem and Echography, 7, 246.
Gathala, M. K., Laing, A. M., Tiwari, T. P., Timsina, J., Islam, S., Bhattacharya, P. M., Dhar, T., Ghosh, A., Sinh, A.K., Chowdhury, A.K., Hossain, S., Hossain, I., Molla, S., Rashid, M., Kumar, S., Kumar, R., Dutta, S.K., Srivastwa, P.K., … & Gérard, G. (2020a). Energy-efficient, sustainable crop production practices benefit smallholder farmers and the environment of the Eastern Gangetic Plains, South Asia. Journal Cleaner Production, 246, 118982.
Gathala, M. K., Laing, A. M., Tiwari, T. P., Timsina, J., Islam, M. S., Chowdhury, A. K., Chattopadhyay, C., Singh, A. K., Bhatt, B. P., Shrestha, R., Barma, N. C. D., Rana, D. S., Jackson, T. M. & Gerard, B. (2020b). Enabling smallholder farmers to sustainably improve their food, energy and water nexus while achieving environmental and economic benefits. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 120, 109645.
Gathala, M.K., Timsina, J., Islam, M. S., Rahman, M. M., Hossain, M. I., Harun-Ar-Rashid, M.d., Ghosh, A. K., Krupnik, T. J., Tiwari, T. P. & McDonald, A. (2015). Conservation agriculture-based tillage and crop establishment options can maintain farmers’ yields and increase profits in South Asia’s rice–maize systems: Evidence from Bangladesh. Field Crops Research, 172, 85–98.
Greene, W.H. (2012). Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 7th edition.
Harding, A., & Greenwell, H. (2001). Trends in Income and Expenditure Inequality in the 1980s and 1990s. Paper Presented to the 30th Annual Conference of Economists. Perth, Western Australia, pp: 118-127.
Jat, M.L., Chakraborty, D., Ladha, J.K., Rana, D.S., Gathala, M.K., McDonald, A. & Gerard, B. (2020). Conservation agriculture for sustainable intensification in South Asia. Nature Sustainability, 3(4), 336-343.
Jozi, S.A., Roniasi, N. & Ataee, S. (2017). Evaluating the environmental vulnerability of the groundwater of Hamedan’s Dasht-e Bahar through DRASTIC, GODS and AVI integrated methods. Conservation and Utilization of Natural Resources, 6(2), 65-82. (In Persian).
Judg, G., Hill, R.C., Griffiths, W.E., Lutkepol, H. & Lee, T.C. (1988). Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics. John Wiley and Sona Inc. 2nd Edition.
Kassam, A., Derpsch, R. & Friedrich, T. (2014). Global achievements in soil and water conservation: The case of Conservation Agriculture. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2(1), 5-13.
Kassam, A., Friedrich, T. & Derpsch, R. (2018). Global spread of Conservation Agriculture. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 76(1), 29-51.
Kolstoe, S., Vander Naald, B. & Cohan, A. (2022). A tale of two samples: Understanding WTP differences in the age of social media. Ecosystem Services, 55, 101420.
Krishna, R., Bicol Ingrid, I.P. & Giridhari, S. (2008). Determinants of farmers' adoption of improved soil conservation technology: In a middle mountain watershed of central Nepal. Environmental Management, 42, 210-222.
Mazvimavi, K. & Twomlow, S. (2009). Socioeconomic and institutional factors influencing adoption of conservation farming by vulnerable households in Zimbabwe. Agricultural Systems, 101(1-2), 20-29.
Moghaddasi, M., Khodaverdizadeh, M., Hashemi Bonab, S. & Sokouti Oskoee, R. (2018). Evaluation of factors affecting the adoption of soil conservation non-mechanical methods in order to maintain the sustainability (Case study: Urmia County). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 28(4), 229-245. (In Persian)
Momeni, D., Hayati, B., Dashti, G. & Rezaei, A. (2012). Factors affecting the adoption of soil mechanical conservation practices in dry Llands of the Izeh township. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 42-2(4), 513-524. (In Persian)
Morello, T.F., Marie-Gabrielle, P., Gardner, T., Parry, L., Barlow, J., Ferreira, J. & Tancredi, N.S. (2018). Fertilizer Adoption by Smallholders in the Brazilian Amazon: Farm-level Evidence. Ecological Economics, 144, 278-291.
Mozaffari, M.M. (2016). Factors influencing on farmers' participation in using soil and water conservation practices (Case study: Alamout region). Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 8(3), 75-89. (In Persian)
Mulugeta, D. & Stahar, K. (2010). Assessment of integrated soil and water conservation measures on key soil properties in South Gonder, North West highlands of Ethiopia. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management, 1(7), 164-176. 
Noori, S.H., Jamshidi, A.R., Jamshidi, M., Hedayati Moghadam, Z. & Fathi, E. (2014). Survey on factors affecting the acceptance of soil conservation measures, a step towards sustainable agriculture; Case study: township of Shirvan and Chardavol. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 45(1), 195-205. (In Persian)
Parhizkari, A., Mozaffari, M.M., Hosseini Khdodadi, M. & Parhizkari, R. (2016). Study of effective factors on farmers' participation of Shahroud watershed (Qazvin province) in applying soil and water conservation practices using multinomial logit model. Journal of Watershed Management Research, 7(13), 253-241. (In Persian)
Savari, M., Yazdanpanah, M. & Rouzaneh, D. (2022). Factors affecting the implementation of soil conservation practices among Iranian farmers. Scientific Reports, 12, 8396.
Sinden, J.A. & King, D.A. (1990). Articles and totes adoption of soil conservation measures in Irland shire, New South Wales. Review Marketing and Agricultural Economics, 58(2-3), 179-192.
Tabaraee, M. & Hassannejad, M. (2009). Factors affecting the acceptance of agricultural extension programs with regards to process of agricultural development: Case study of wheat farmers in Mashhad. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 23(1), 59-68. (In Persian)
Tiwari, K.R., Sitaula, B.K., Nyborg, I.L.P. & Paudel, G.S. (2008). Determinant of farmer adoption of introduced soil and water conservation technology in middle mountain watershed of central Nepal. Environmental Management, 42, 210-222.
Yacouba Karidjo, B., Wang, Zh., Boubacar, Y. & Wei, C. (2018). Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of soil and water control technology (SWCT) in Keita valley, a semi-arid area of Niger. Sustainability, 10, 288.