Evaluation of conservation and recreational functions of Hamoon wetland, using conditional valuation approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department Of Economics and Agricultural Development, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Economic, Social and Extension Research Department, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Zabol, Iran

3 Assistant Professor Faculty member of institution of humanity and social sciences of ACECR, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Wetland services include recreational use, harvested meat (as direct consumption values) and carbon sequestration, oxygen production, water conservation and soil conservation (as indirect consumption values). In addition to use values, wetlands have other values; these values are the sums that individuals are willing to pay to protect wetlands for future use, for future generations to enjoy them, and for their mere existence. In this paper, the value of goods and services of Hamoon Wetland ecosystem in Sistan region in the form of information functions (recreational and protective values) in 2019 has been estimated. The information needed to estimate the value of these functions was collected using a questionnaire. Recreational and conservation values of Hamoon wetland as the recreational value of forest ecosystem of Hamoon wetland, was collected by collecting information from 350 people randomly in the villages around the wetland and the conditional valuation method. Based on the obtained results, the value of recreational and protective functions of Hamoon Wetland was estimated at 629.82 million Rials and 644.2 billion Rials, respectively. In case of collecting fees from visitors in order to use the recreational function of the wetland and its cost to maintain the wetland, it is possible to develop and preserve its existing values.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Ahmed, S.U., & Gotoh, K. (2006). Cost-Benefit Analysis of Environmental Goods by Applying the Contingent Valuation Method (Some Japanese Case Studies). Springer-Verlag Tokyo.
  2. Allen, J.C., Bergstrom, J., & Pemberton, C. (2003). Measuring Values for Wetlands Protection in a Developing Country from Domestic and International Citizen Groups. Paper Presented for Preservation at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada, July 27-30.
  3. Amirnejad, H. & Ataie solute, K. 2011. Economic valuation of environmental resources. First edition, Sari: Avayeh masih publication. (In Farsi)
  4. Arman, H. & Dehnavi, M. (2012). Evaluation of ecological value of Hamoon wetland, study of the biodiversity potential of the wetland in flooded conditions. The Second Biennial Conference on Environmental EngineeringTehran, environment college. (In Farsi)
  5. Bateman, I., (2019). Placing Money Values on the Unpriced Benefits of Forest. Quarterly Journal of Forestry, 85(3), 152-165.
  6. Bishop, R., & Heberlein, T.A. (2019). Measuring Values of Extra-Market Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, 926-930.
  7. Boyle, K.J. & R.C. Bishop. (2018). Welfare Measurement Using Contingent Valuation: A Comparision of Techniques. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70, 20-28.
  8. Daneshi, A., A. Najafinejad, F. Maghsoud & M. Panahi, 2017. Estimating the conservation Value of Ardebil’s Shorabil Lake. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 11(2): 135-155. [In Persian]
  9. Dehnavi, J., (2012). Presentation and application of spatial evaluation model of wetland ecosystem services using geographic information system Case study: Wetlands of the ancient region of Nowshahr. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran. [In Persian]
  10. Duffield, J.W. & Patterson, D.A. (2017). Inference and Optimal Design for a Welfare Measure in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation. Land Economics, 67, 225-239.
  11. Environmental Protection Organization. 2014. Studies to identify the development of water resources in Hamoon Wetland, Vegetation Report, I, 36-39. [In Persian]
  12. General Department of Natural Resources of Sistan and Baluchestan Province., (2011). Hamoon wetland protection plan. Volume One: Summary of Hamoon Wetland Studies. [In Persian].
  13. Hanemann, M., Loomis J., & Kanninen, B. (2018). Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. ,73(4), 1255-1263.
  14. Hanemann, W. M. (2018). Welfare Evaluation in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66, 332-341.
  15. Mohammadian, F., & Samdeliri, A. (2021). Evaluation of the accuracy of benefit transfers in contingent valuation method (case study: SardabRud River). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 52(3), 643-654. (In Farsi)
  16. Park, T., & J. loomis. (2019). Joint Estimation of Contingent Valuation Survey Responses. Environmental and Resource Economics, 7, 149-162.
  17. M., 2008. Fundamentals of economic evaluation of natural resources. University of Tehran Press, first edition. (In Farsi)
  18. Sinaei, M., Hosseini, A., & dalir boostansaraei, S. (2020). Economic Valuation of non-use Functions (preservation value, heritage and existence) of Environmental Resource International Govater Bay a Hur-e-Bahu Wetland. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22(3), 335-347. (In Farsi)
Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research
Volume 53, Issue 1
February 2022
Pages 129-143

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics