Analysis of the Role of Agricultural Higher Education in Rural Sustainable Livelihood: A Study of Urmia Lake Basin

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Agricultural Extension and Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

Abstract

By studying the knowledge-based development indicators and emphasizing educational infrastructures, especially the agricultural education system, education and its role is the most important and effective tool for communities to overcome the challenges of the third millennium. Then, this study was conducted with Descriptive-Correlation method aiming to show the role of agricultural higher education in rural sustainable livelihoods. The statistical population of the study includes farmers who graduated from agricultural higher education centers. According to the statistics provided by the agricultural Jihad organizations in East and West Azarbaijan, their number is about 550 people. 225 of them were selected randomly as the sample using Krejcie and Morgan tables. In order to process and analyze data, the Spss25 software has been used. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was also used to achieve the experimental model. To do this, the Amos24 software has been used. The results showed that the components such as education, structure and context, teaching and learning methods, research and learning experiences were the basic dimensions of agricultural education in relation to sustainable rural livelihoods. They were able to explain 57% variance of sustainable livelihoods.

Keywords


Extended Abstract

Objectives

By studying the knowledge-based development indicators and emphasizing educational infrastructures, especially the agricultural education system, education and its role is the most important and effective tool for communities to overcome the challenges of the third millennium. In this regard, considering the importance of the role of Agricultural Higher Education in rural sustainable livelihood, the main objective of this study was to analyzing the role of Agricultural Higher Education in rural sustainable livelihood in the Urmia Lake Basin.

 

Methods

This research were applied in terms of purpose, field in terms of data collection and quantitative in nature. The research tool was a researcher-made questionnaire. This study was conducted with Descriptive-Correlation method aiming to show the role of agricultural higher education in rural sustainable livelihoods. The statistical population of the study includes farmers who graduated from agricultural higher education centers. According to the statistics provided by the agricultural Jihad-E-Keshavarzi organizations in East and West Azerbaijan, their number was about 550 people who 225 of them selected randomly as the sample using Krejcie and Morgan tables. In order to process and analyze data, the Spss25 software used. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and path analysis also used to achieve the experimental model. To do Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the Amos24 software has been used.

 

Results

The results showed that the components such as education, structure and context, teaching and learning methods, research and learning experiences were the basic dimensions of agricultural education in relation to sustainable rural livelihoods. They were able to explain 57% variance of sustainable livelihoods. Path analysis also showed that, people’s   livelihood capitals has meaningful and direct impact to their sustainable livelihood.

 

Discussion

The main aim of this study was to analyzing the role of Agricultural Higher Education in rural sustainable livelihood in the Urmia Lake Basin. The study conducted with Descriptive-Correlation method aiming to show the role of agricultural higher education in rural sustainable livelihoods. In order to process and analyze data, the Spss25 software used. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) also used to achieve the experimental model. To do Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the Amos24 software has been used. Based on the results do Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the components such as education, structure and context, teaching and learning methods, research and learning experiences were the basic dimensions of agricultural education in relation to sustainable rural livelihoods. In addition, according to path analysis, people livelihood capitals has meaningful and direct impact to their sustainable livelihood.  According to the results of the study, it is suggested to the use of background of sustainable development and conceptual skills in the university curriculum in the field of agricultural engineering disciplines. Designing experiential learning in the educational programs to sustainable development must be conducted in the  agricultural engineering disciplines in the agricultural faculties and universities.

Author Contributions

For research articles with several authors, a short paragraph specifying their individual contributions must be provided. The following statements should be used “Conceptualization, E.A. and A.R.; methodology, A.R. and S.H.M.M.; software, E.A.; validation, E.A., A.R. and S.H.M.M.; formal analysis, E.A.; investigation, E.A.; resources, S.Y.H. and S.A.P.; data curation, E.A.; writing—original draft preparation, E.A.; writing—review and editing, A.R.; visualization, A.R.; supervision, A.R. and S.H.M.M.; project administration, A.R.; S.H.M.M; S.Y.H and S.A.P.X.X.; funding acquisition, A.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.” Please turn to the CRediT taxonomy for the term explanation. Authorship must be limited to those who have contributed substantially to the work re-ported.

All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization of the article and writing of the original and subsequent drafts.

Data Availability Statement

In this section, please provide details regarding where data supporting reported results can be found, including links to publicly archived datasets analyzed or generated during the study (see examples). Data available on request from the authors.

If the study did not report any data, you might add “Not applicable” here.

Acknowledgements

The Acknowledgments section should be a few sentences at the end, but it is important to recognize those people (organizations and individuals) who made considerable impact on the research, provided significant help to the author to formulate and complete the experiment, and improved the research at any stage (from providing access to equipment or field sites to editing the manuscript). However, this is an optional section.

In this section, you can acknowledge any support given which is not covered by the author contribution or funding sections. This may include administrative and technical support, or donations in kind (e.g., materials used for experiments).

The authors would like to thank all participants of the present study.

Ethical considerations

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of ABCD (Ethical code: IR.UT.RES.2024.500). The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

 

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES
Cortese, A.D. (2003). The Critical Role of Higher Education in Creating a Sustainable Future. Planning for Higher Education, 31(3), 15-22.
Dawe, G., Jucker, R. & Martin, S. (2005). Sustainable development in higher education: current practice and future developments. Higher Education Academy, York Science Park, Heslington, York, from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/docum ents/sustainability/sustdevinHEfinalreport. pdf.
Fiorella, L. and Mayer, R.E. (2014). Role of expectations and explanations in learning by teaching. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 75-85.
Holmberg, J. & Samuelsson, B. (2006). Drivers and barriers for implementing sustainable development in higher education. UNESCO Education sector, Technical paper 3, UNESCO. pp. 7-11.
Iravani, H. Shabanali Fami, H. Alibiqi, A.H. Kalantari, K. Ashtiani, S.R. (2006). A model for integrating sustainability in agricultural higher education. Iranian Agriculture Sciences Journal. 37(2). (In Farsi).
Khodabakhshi, A. Movahed Mohamadi, H. Fami, H. Sh. (2013). Analysis of Quality Components of Electronic Education in Iranian Higher Education in Agriculture. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 44(4), 693-707.
Krantz, L (2001). The sustainable Livelihood Approach to Poverty Rednduction, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.
Molden (2007). Water for food, water for life: A comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture, Earthscan / International Water Management Institute, London / Colombo.
Rodriguez, U.P. Lorenzo, M. Alvarez, X. Losada, M. (2016). Pursuing the goal of sustainable action in the basic training of teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228(2016), 587 – 592.
Stephens, J.C., and A.C. Graham (2010). Toward an empirical research agenda for sustainability in higher education: exploring the transition management framework, Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(7), 611-618.
Segalas J, Ferrer-Balas D, Svanstrom M, Lundqvist U, Mulder KF (2009). What has to be learnt for sustainability? A comparison of bachelor engineering education competencies at three European universities. Sust Sci 4(1):17–27
Shen, F. Hughey, K. Simmons, D (2008). Connecting livelihood farmworker for indicators Measuring Sustainable development. Ecological Indicator, 2(3), 295-309.
UNESCO. (1997). Educating for a Sustainable Future: A Transdiciplinary Vision for Concerted Action. EPD-97/CONF.401/CLD.1.November 1997. 
World Bank .(2008). World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. The World Bank, Washington, DC.