Analysis of Institutional Constraints to Groundwater Resources Management in Aleshtar Township of Lorestan Province

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agriculture Sciences and Ntural Resources University of Khuzestan, Ahvaz, Iran

2 PhD. Student, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Khuzestan Agriculture Sciences and Natural Resources University, Mollasani, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran

4 Professor, Department of Rural Development Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran.

Abstract

   Groundwater crisis has become a major problem in Lorestan province. Meanwhile, Aleshtar township is one of the cities affected by this crisis. While there are several reasons for the underlying groundwater crisis in the township, one of the most important challenges facing this township can be due to the institutional constraints by stakeholders involved in groundwater resources management. Thus, this study describes institutional constraints to groundwater resource management in Aleshtar using grounded theory approach. Participants were 24 key informants involved in the groundwater resources management in Aleshtar township that to select the samples, targeted sampling approach using snowball sampling technique was used. Thus, participants were interviewed in-depth and interviews were recorded and transcribed for qualitative analysis. In the present study, the result of open coding was the extraction of 170 concepts and 43 sub-categories. Based on the paradigm model, the core category identified in this research was “institutional structural and functional weakness” which found to be related to other categories of meanings. The result show that, the most important context conditions the occurrence of the phenomenon were “farmers weak financial vigor”, “cultural elements as barriers to groundwater resources management” and “traditional agriculture”. The results of research on the causal conditions affecting the occurrence of this phenomenon indicate “irregular and excessive harvesting of groundwater resources” and “weak control and monitoring” as the most important causes. In this study, “climate change” and "poor performance of secondary institutions involved in groundwater resources management" were among the most important intervening condition that have led to the intensification of the phenomenon. The most important action/interaction strategies of institutions to overcome the phenomenon were the sub-categories of “implementing water engineering and control” and “farmers participation”. Finally, implementing action/interaction strategies can have both positive and negative consequences. The most important positive consequences was “improvements to farming”. However, the most important negative consequences included “destruction of natural resources” and “occurrence of economic problems” and “occurrence of social problems”. 

Keywords


  1. Agrawal, A. (2008). The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change. 1-65.
  2. Arts, B., van Bommel, S., Ros-Tonen, M., & Verschoor, G. (Eds.). (2012). Forest People Interfaces: understanding community forestry and biocultural diversity. Springer Science & Business Media, 1-317.
  3. Asadi, M.A., & Najafi Alamdarlo, H. (2019). Economic evaluation of optimum cultivating pattern for reducing the use of groundwater in Dehgolan plain. Journal of agricultural economics and development research, 50(1), 29-43. (In Farsi).
  4. Behnken, J. A., Groninger, J. W., & Akamani, K. (2016). Institutional constraints to collaborative ecosystem management within a wetlands conservation partnership. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 158(1), 19-33.
  5. Castilla-Rho, J. C., Rojas, R., Andersen, M. S., Holley, C., & Mariethoz, G. (2019). Sustainable groundwater management: How long and what will it take?. Global Environmental Change58, 1-15.
  6. Chang, S. W., Chung, I. M., Kim, M. G., Tolera, M., & Koh, G. W. (2019). Application of GALDIT in Assessing the Seawater Intrusion Vulnerability of Jeju Island, South Korea. Water11(9), 1-17.
  7. Chen, J., Wu, H., Qian, H., & Li, X. (2018). Challenges and prospects of sustainable groundwater management in an agricultural plain along the Silk Road Economic Belt, north-west China. International journal of water resources development34(3), 1-15.
  8. Cleaver, F. (2002). Reinventing institutions: Bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. The European journal of development research, 14(2), 11-30.
  9. Cruz, J. V., & Soares, N. (2018). Groundwater Governance in the Azores Archipelago (Portugal): Valuing and Protecting a Strategic Resource in Small Islands. Water10(4), 1-20.
  10. Custodio, E. (2010). Intensive groundwater development: A water cycle transformation, a social revolution, a management challenge. Rethinking water and food security. Botın Foundation/CRC Press, Boca Raton, 259-298.
  11. De Loe, R. C., Krewtzwiser, R. D., & Neufeld, D. (2005). Local groundwater source protection in Ontario and the Provincial Water Protection Fund. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 30(2), 129-144.
  12. De Stefano, L., & Lopez-Gunn, E. (2012). Unauthorized groundwater use: institutional, social and ethical considerations. Water Policy, 14(S1), 147-160.
  13. De Stefano, L., Fornes, J. M., Lopez-Geta, J. A., & Villarroya, F. (2015). Groundwater use in Spain: an overview in light of the EU Water Framework Directive. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 31(4), 640-656.
  14. Etzold, B., Julich, S., Keck, M., Sakdapolrak, P., Schmitt, T., & Zimmer, A. (2012). Doing institutions. A dialectic reading of institutions and social practices and its relevance for development geography. Erdkunde, 66(3), 185-195.
  15. Hosseininia, GH., Abbasi, M., & Geravandi, SH. (2019). Designing and selecting optimal scenario for outsourcing of tropical farming projects of Mostazafan Foundation of Islamic Revolution; emphasizing the empowerment of agricultural graduates. Journal of agricultural economics and development research, 50(4), 849-871. (In Farsi).
  16. Ioris, A. (2008). Water institutional reforms in Scotland: Contested objectives and hidden disputes. Water Alternatives1(2), 253-270.
  17. Islam, M. T., & Nursey-Bray, M. (2017). Adaptation to climate change in agriculture in Bangladesh: the role of formal institutions. Journal of environmental management200, 347-358.
  18. Ison, R., Röling, N., & Watson, D. (2007). Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning. Environmental science & policy10(6), 499-511.
  19. Ivey, J. L., De Loe, R. C., & Kreutzwiser, R. D. (2002). Groundwater management by watershed agencies: an evaluation of the capacity of Ontario’s conservation authorities. Journal of Environmental Management, 64(3), 311-331.
  20. Kiparsky, M., Milman, A., Owen, D., & Fisher, A. (2017). The importance of institutional design for distributed local-level governance of groundwater: The case of California’s sustainable groundwater management act. Water9(10), 1-17.
  21. Llamas, M. R., & Martinez-Santos, P. (2005). Intensive groundwater use: silent revolution and potential source of social conflicts, Journal of water resources planning and management, 131(5), 337-341.
  22. Madani, K. (2014). Water management in Iran: what is causing the looming crisis?. Journal of environmental studies and sciences, 4(4), 315-328.
  23. Milman, A., Galindo, L., Blomquist, W., & Conrad, E. (2018). Establishment of agencies for local groundwater governance under California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. Water alternatives11(3), 458-480.
  24. Nabavi, E. (2018). Failed policies, falling aquifers: Unpacking groundwater overabstraction in Iran. Water Alternatives11(3), 699-724.
  25. Piyapong, J., Thidarat, B., Jaruwan, C., Siriphan, N., & Passanan, A. (2019). Enhancing citizens' sense of personal responsibility and risk perception for promoting public participation in sustainable groundwater resource management in Rayong Groundwater Basin, Thailand. Groundwater for Sustainable Development9, 1-12.
  26. Rahimi Feyzabad, F., Yazdanpanah, M., & Gholamrezai, S. (2019). Investigating institutional arrangements in groundwater resources management in Iran. Tropentag Conference 2019, Kassel, Germany September 18-20.
  27. Rahmati, O., Samani, A. N., Mahdavi, M., Pourghasemi, H. R., & Zeinivand, H. (2015). Groundwater potential mapping at Kurdistan region of Iran using analytic hierarchy process and GIS. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 8(9), 7059-7071.
  28. Regional Water Company of Lorestan. (2019). Retrieved from http://www.lsrw.ir/
  29. Rudestam, K., Brown, A., & Langridge, R. (2018). Exploring “Deep Roots”: Politics of Place and Groundwater Management Practices in the Pajaro Valley, California. Society & natural resources31(3), 291-305.
  30. Tello, E., & Hazelton, J. (2018). The challenges and opportunities of implementing general purpose groundwater accounting in Australia. Australasian journal of environmental management25(3), 1-17.
  31. Vrba, J., & Salamat, A. (2007). Groundwater for emergency situations. Published: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), 15, 1-128.
  32. Wagoro, M. C. A. (2016). A grounded theory of the Kenya human interaction model for mental health nursing practice (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Town), 1-280.
  33. Xia, J., Wu, X., Zhan, C., Qiao, Y., Hong, S., Yang, P., & Zou, L. (2019). Evaluating the Dynamics of Groundwater Depletion for an Arid Land in the Tarim Basin, China. Water11(2), 1-19.
  34. Yazdanpanah, M., & Rahimi Feyzabad, F. (2019). Reasons for the Failure of Agricultural Extension Using Grounded Theory (Case Study: Lorestan Agricultural Jihad). Journal of agricultural economics and development research, 50(3), 549-575. (In Farsi).