Multifunctional Agricultural Development Strategies In Dehloran Township (Ilam province)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D student in agricultural development, Department of Agriculture Extension and Education, College of Agriculture, Razi university of Kermanshah, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Agriculture Extension and Education, College of Agriculture, Razi university of Kermanshah, Iran

3 Assistant professor. Department of Agriculture Extension and Education, College of Agriculture, Razi university of Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

Dehloran Township, Despite the great distance from multifunctional agriculture it faces many problems in the fields of agriculture, natural resources, environment and economic situation, If no measures are taken to reduce these problems and eliminate them More problems will be faced by the present and future generations of agriculture and rural areas of this Township. Since the development of multifunctional agriculture requires attention to planning and strategy tailored to the conditions of each region. The aim of this qualitative study was, preparation multifunctional agricultural development strategies in Dehloran Township (Ilam province). The study population was purposefully selected from 21 multifunctional agricultural experts in one of the western regions of Iran, Dehloran Township. Data were collected using in-depth and semi-structured interviews in five steps of the Meta-SWOT technique based on the Resource-based theory. After completing the interviews, the position of Dehloran Township in comparison with competitors, existing resources and obstacles affecting the development of MFA were identified. After analyzing the interviews and evaluating the impact of each resource on environmental factors and their relevance to the objectives, a strategic map was drawn. In examining all aspects of the strategic map, three rare, Inimitable and Non-substitutable capabilities, one with the most strategic fit, an environmental factor were identified as the most important and powerful obstacle to the growth and development of MFA. Finally, judging by each of the internal and environmental factors, 15 optimal strategies for MFA development were preparated in order of importance using the AHP technique. By implementing the preparated strategies, it is possible to help strengthen and develop the existing capabilities and remove the existing obstacles, and with proper planning, we will witness the development of more multifunctional agriculture in the future.

Keywords


  1. Arovuori, K., & Kola, J. (2005). Policies and measures for multifunctional agriculture: experts’ insight. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 8 (3),21-51.
  2. Agarwal, R., Grassl, W., & Pahl, J. (2012). Meta-SWOT: introducing a new strategic planning tool. Journal of Business Strategy, 33 (2), 12-21.
  3. Alibaygi, A.H., & Borzoo, GH. (2014). Multifunctional agriculture (MFA) from viewpoint iranian specialists’ agricultural and rural development. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 44(3), 501-511. (In Farsi).
  4. Dasgupta, P., Goswami, R., Nasim Ali, M., Chakraborty, S., & Saha, S. (2015). Multifunctional role of integrated farming system in developing countries. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management, 6(3),424-432.
  5. Hole, F., Flannery, K.V., & Neely, J.A. (1969). Prehistory and human ecology of the dehluran plain: an early village sequence from khuzistan, iran. by the Regents of the University of Michigan The Museum of Anthropology, First Edition.
  6. Heijman, W.J.M., Heringa, P.W., & Van der Heide, C.M. (2012). The economic impact of multifunctional agriculture in The Netherlands: A regional input-output model. Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) Triennial Conference, , 18-24 August 2012, Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil, pp1-28.
  7. Island, P. (2009). Towards Multifunctional Agriculture for Social, Environmental and Economic Sustainability. International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development. Global program review , 4 (2), 1-6, Retrieved from https://islandpress.org.
  8. Kiani feyzabad, Z. (2012). The Multifunctional Role of Iran's Agricultural Sector in Policy Analysis: Application of Computable General Equilibrium Model (CGE). MSc Thesis of Faculty of Engineering, Sari University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran. (In Farsi).
  9. Kheirollahi, M., Alibaygi, A.H., & Rostami Ghobadi, F. (2020). Investigating the Status of Multifunctional Agriculture Components in Dehloran Township. Journal of Rural Research. Articles in press, Accepted Manuscript Available online from 02 july 2020 from https://jrur.ut.ac.ir/article_76853.html. (In Farsi).
  10. Lusquinos, S. (2015). Funding multifunctional entrepreneurship, A framework for identifying factors influencing the allocation of European Agricultural Funds for Rural Development for multifunctional entrepreneurial activities. MSc Thesis of Management of Life Science, Department: Management Studies, wageningen university, Netherlands.
  11. Mahmoudi, M., & Chizari, M. (2018). Multifinctional Agriculture the new Paradigm of Sustainable Rural Development. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization seed and plant Improvement Institute. Publication of agricultural education, First Edition. (In Farsi).
  12. Mehrabi basharabadi, H., & Javedan, A. (2011). Research and development on the growth and productivity of Iran's agricultural sector. Journal of agricultural Economics and Development, 25 (2),172-180. (In Farsi).
  13. Mohammadi,Y., & Razzaghi Borkhani, F. ( 2018). The Design of TOWS Strategic Model for Rural and Agricultural Tourism Development of Mazandaran Province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 49 (3),509-525. (In Farsi).
  14. OECD. (2001). Multifunctionality Towards an Analytical Framework.Organisation for Economic Co Operation and Development. Retrived from word wide: http://www.oecd.org/tad/agricultural policies/multifunctionalityinagriculture.htm
  15. Renting, H., Rossing, W.A.H., Groot, J.C.J., Van der ploeg, J.D., Laurent, C., Perraud, D., Stobbelaar, D.J., & Van ittersum, M.K. (2009). Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 90 (2009), 112–123.
  16. Rezaei, A., & Jalilian, S. (2019). The Investigating of factors on rural tourism management strategy by using SWOT technique and QSPM matrix in kermanshah Province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 50(1), 201-218. (In Farsi).
  17. Shakarami, N., Shokuhi, M., & Mansourzadeh, A.M. (2018). Tourism Strategic planning of Kurdistan province based on the regional competitiveness using meta-swot technique. Journal of URBAN studies, 7(26),17-30. (In Farsi).
  18. Takahashi, Y., & Nijkamp, P .(2010). Multifunctional Agricultural Land Use in a Sustainable World. Romanian Jornal of Regional Science, the journal of the Romanian regional scince association, 4(2),1-31.
  19. Wilson, G.A .(2007). Multifunctional Agriculture A Transition Theory Perspective. Printed and bound in the UK by Cromwell Press, Trowbridge, 1-363, Retrieved from Website: www.cabi.org.
  20. Yazdanpanah, m. (2018). Multifunctional Agriculture Paradigm; Rural Tourism, a key to sustainable employment development in rural areas. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Agriculture, 5(1), 17-29. (In Farsi).