Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research

Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research

Sustainable Entrepreneurship Devehopement Mechanisms in Educational Systems and Orientations

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Soleil Bakan 1
Ramezan Jahanian 2
Parisa Irannejad 3
1 PhD Student in Educational Management, Department of Educational Sciences, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
10.22059/ijaedr.2020.290151.668823
Abstract
Entrepreneurship is one of the important stimulus factor for social and economic development in society development process. Stability of entrepreneurship important as much as entrepreneurship itself. As world face with daily changes in human society and unemployment and lack of prepare training are one of the most important disturbance for many governments. These problems become more serious especially in the field of agriculture in which trained and amateur work force are gathered. Existing theories about the relationship between education and entrepreneurship can be positive and normative. In the normative theory, education must be obedient to the production system, and education will be successful and effective, with high levels of entrepreneurship and a loyalty to business ratio. In the positivist theories, one of which is the theory of human capital, it provides the simplest explanation about the relationship between education and entrepreneurship. Accordingly, the main purpose of the present study is to identify and rank the components of entrepreneurship development, sustainable development in the country’s education system.This research is a descriptive survey, and data collection tool is a two-stage Delphi expert questionnaire. The statistical population of experts includes experts, educational specialists and non-random sampling method was selected with 12 interviews.  Based on the results of two Delphi rounds and consensus panel members and reaching theoretical saturation, 80 indicators identified by experts. Among the all criteria for entrepreneurship development, the highest priority given to individual and economic factors and lowest priority goes to political and cultural criteria.  Educational system is the main factor in mampower training.Therefor it should be identic in cope with changes and be able to solving unempioyment related problems. Considering sustainable entrepreneurship development indicators its expected that the educational system be capable for step forward to find some practical solutions for unemployment through focus on sustainable entrepreneurship development.
Keywords
Entrepreneurship
Entrepreneurship Development
Sustainable Development
Country Education System
  1. Abou- Ward, S.H. (2016). New educational services development: framework for technology entrepreneurship education at universities in Egypt. International Journal of Educational Management, 30 (5), 698-717.
  2. Aldrich, H.E. (2011). Heroes, villains, and fools: institutional entrepreneurship, NOT institutional entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 1 (2), 2-2.
  3. Başçı. E. S. & Reha Metin, A. (2015). Entrepreneurship Education at Universities: Suggestion for a Model Using Financial Support, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 856 – 861.
  4. Cantu-Ortiz, F. J., Nathalíe, G., Patricia, M. & James, F. (2017). spreading academic entrepreneurship: Made in Mexico, Business Horizons, 60(4), 541-550.
  5. Clauss, T., Kesting, T., Miller, K. & Meerman, A. (2018). Quo Vadis Entrepreneurial
    University? The Need for Multi-Levels of Analysis, International Journal of Technology Management, 77(1-3), 1-8.
  6. Colander, D. (2000). The death of neoclassical economics. Journal of the history of Economic
    Thought    , 22(2), 127-143.
  7. Cristina, M. D. (2016). Promoting Technological Entrepreneurship through Sustainable Engineering Education, Procedia Technology, 22, 1129-1134.
  8. Dalkey, N. (1963). An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method on the use of experts, Management Science, 9(3), 458-467.
  9. Fayolle, A., Guerrero, M., Klofsten, M., Mian, S., Urbano, D. & Wright, M. M. (2017). The
    entrepreneurial university as driver for economic growth and social change: key
    strategic challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Chang, 141, 149-158.
  10. Gibbs, D. (2009). Sustainability Entrepreneurs, Ecopreneurs and the Development of a Sustainable Economy. Greener Management International, 55, 63-78.
  11. Gür, U., Oylumlu, İ.S., Kunday, Ö. (2017). Critical assessment of entrepreneurial and innovative universities index of Turkey: future directions. Technological Forecasting and Social Chang, 123, 161–168.
  12. Hosseini, M., Hosseini, J. & Soleimanpoor, M. (2010). An Identification and Analysis of Hindering Barriers of Entrepreneurship in Higher Agricultural Education as Perceived by Graduate Students. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 41 (1), 105-0116, (in Farsi).
  13. Khosravipoor, B. & Monajemzadeh, Z. (2011). Ramin Agricultural and Natural Resources University Graduate Students' Viewpoints about Challenges and Obstacles of Higher Education in Training Entrepreneurship Oriented Graduates. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 42 (1), 105-0116, (in Farsi).
  14. Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: refocusing institutional
    studies of organization. Management Inquiry, 20 (1), 52–58.
  15. Miller, K., McAdam, R., McAdam, M. (2018). A systematic literature review of university
    technology transfer from a quadruple helix perspective: toward a research agenda. R
    &D Management,     48 (1), 7–24.
  16. OECD (2018). Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2018, London: pub OECD.
  17. Olori, Gloria I. & Olori, Christian N. (2018). Strategies and Challenges for Empowering Youth through Technical Vocational Education and Training Programme in Rivers Stat, Benchmark Journal, 6(1):121-131.
  18. Okoli, c (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design concideration and applications. Information and Management, 24, 15 – 29.
  19. Paul, W., Christine, W. & Deborah, S. (2017). Sustainable entrepreneurship: another avenue for family business scholarship? Journal of Family Business Management, 7(1), 122-132
  20. Rowe, G (1999). The Delphi technique as a forcasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forcasting, 15, 353-375.
  21. Rezaie, R. & Mirie Karam, F. (2018). The Impact of Entrepreneurial Training Components on Entrepreneurial Skills Development in Agricultural Students (Case Study: University of Tehran). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research. 49(2), 225-238, (in Farsi).
  22. Spash, C. L. (2012). New foundations for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 77, 36-
    47.
  23. Swanson. K. K. & DeVereaux, C. (2017). A theoretical framework for sustaining culture: Culturally sustainable entrepreneurship, Annals of Tourism Research, 62, 78–88.
  24. Wakkeea, I., Van Der Sijdeb. P., Christiaan, V. & Karminder, G. (2019). The university's role in sustainable development: Activating entrepreneurial scholars as agents of change, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 141, 195-205
Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research
Volume 51, Issue 3
Summer 2020
Pages 499-512