Factors affecting the adoption and rejection of safety crops in the Khuzestan

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Abstract

A safety crop is defined by the matter produced with least chemical input (fertilizer) usage in order to have no risk for consumers. This study was done to investigate the factors affecting adoption and/or rejection of cultivating safety crops and to assign the best fitted model of adoption among vegetable growers in Khuzestan Province. The study was based on a survey method using a non-proportional stratified random sampling, in which 170 safety crop adopters as well as 170 non-adopters were selected. The data were gathered through a questionnaire. The results revealed that there was a significant difference between both groups in term of using information channels and the number of visiting change agents. In addition, the adopters of safe crops had more favorite attitude toward protection of environment and low usage of external chemical inputs. They demonstrated more awareness of the disadvantageous of conventional agriculture. The findings showed that the multiplicity model was the best fitted model which could well discriminate the adopters from non-adopters. The study followed by proposing some recommendations in which policy makers were advised to apply multi-dimensional (or multiplicity) model along with pay more attention to the quality of education and ratify the legal laws to support of safety crop producers

Keywords


  1. Adekun, O. A.,Adereti,F. O. & Opele, A. I. (2006). Factors  influencing  adoption  of fisheries innovations  by artisanal fisherman in coastal areas of Ogun state. Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences Research. 2.11:966-971
  2. Bonabana, J. (2002).  Assessing factors affecting adoption of agricultural technologies: The Case of        Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in Kumi District, Eastern Uganda. Agricultural And Applied Economics, pp:23-34 .
  3. Chrystopher, G. & Kristallis, J. (2005). Consumerr’s willingness to pay for organic food. British Food Journal. 107:320-34
  4. Dima, S.J. & Odero, A.N. (1997). Organic farming for sustainable agricultural production: a brief theoretical review and preliminary empirical evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics, 10: 177-188.
  5. Duff, S.N.; D.P., Stonehouse; D.J., Blackburn & Hitts, S.G. (1992). A framework for targeting soil conservation policy, Journal of Rural Studies, 8(4). 399-410.
  6. Farshad, A. Zinck, J. A. (2003). Seeking agricultural sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 47, 1-12.
  7. Feleke, SH. & Zegeye, T. (2006). Adoption of improved maize variates in southern ethipia: Factors and strategy options. Food policy. 31: 442-457.
  8. Haghjoo, M; Hayati, B;. Mohammad Rezaei,R; Pish Bahar, A, &  Dashti, B.( 2011). Potential factors influencing consumers' willingness to pay increased rates for safe Food. JournalofAgricultural and

sustainable production. 22(3): 105-117 (In Farsi).

  1. Hashemi-Nejad, A. Rezvanfar, A. (2011). Evaluation of the problems from the perspective of organic farming organic product producers Rawansar city of Kermanshah. Iranian Fertilizer Challenges Congress: half a century of fertilizer 3 March, 2011.(In Farsi).
  2. Hooks, G. M.; T.L. Napier and M.V. Carter . (1983). Correlates of adoption behaviors: The case of farm
  3. Hosseini, J. & Ajoudani, Z. (2012). Affective Factors in Adopting Organic Farming in Iran. Scholars Research Library Annals of Biological Research,  3 (1):601-608
  4. Karami, E. (1995), Models of soil conservation technology adoption in developing countries: The case of Iran, Iran Agricultural Research, 14: 39-62. (In Farsi).
  5. Karami, E, Rezaei Moghadam, K. &  Ebrahimi, H. (2006). The prediction of sprinkler irrigation’s adoption model: Comparing Models. Journalof Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources. 10(1), 71-89 (In Farsi).
  6. Kings, D. & Ilbery, B. (2012). Farmers’ Attitudes towards Organic and Conventional Agriculture: A Behavioural Perspective. Organic Food and Agriculture – New Trends and Developments in the Social Sciences .PP. 145- 168
  7. Lapple, D.  & Rensburg, T . (2011). Adoption of organic farming: Are there differences between early and late adoption? Ecological Economics. 70 : 1406–1414
  8. Laing, T. (2009). How new is the world food crisis? Thoughts on the long dynamic of food democracy, food control and food policy in the 21st century, paper presented to the Visible Warnings: The World Food Crisis in Perspective conference, April 3-4, Cornhill University, Ithaca, NY
  9. Langroodi, h & Khorasani, M. (2010). Opportunities and threats in the sphere of production of safe products in Iran. The first national conference on sustainable agriculture and healthy crop production, Isfahan, Persian date  20-19 November, 2010.(In Farsi).
  10. Langyintuo, A. S.; Gyasi, K. O.; Abatania, L. N. & Tebobri, P. (2000). Determinants of adoption of improved rice varieties in the Inland valleya of northern Ghana. A tobit model application. Paper submitted to the SADAOC foundation for the SADAOC international conference. 1-34.
  11. Lwesya, A.  (2004). Impact of treadle pump adoption on food security, Kasungu Distrink Malavi.  MSC. Thesis. 1-90
  12. Maleksaeedi, H. (2007). Factors influencing  knowledge of and attitude towards organic farming among agricultural expertsof Jihad-e-keshavarzi Organization of Khuzestan and Fars provinces. Master's thesis, University of Agriculture and Natural Resources Ramin. (In Farsi).
  13. Mirzashahi, K & Salimpour, S. (2010). What is safe product? Journalof productssafeGateway of organic farming. 340(1): 1-12. (In Farsi).
  14. Moradi, N; Heidari, H; Azizi, M & Yaghobi, A. (2011). Analysis of the role of organic agriculture as a development platform for sustainable agriculture from an agricultural perspective.  Proceedings of the National Conference for Sustainable Rural Development, Hamadan University of Bu Ali Sina. (In Farsi).
  15. Napier, T.L.; Theran, C.S., &  Mc Claskie, S.L. (1988). Adoption of soil conservation practices by farmers in erosion – prone areas of Ohio: The application of logit modeling, Society and Natural Resources, 1:109-129
  16. Nowak, P.J. (1987). The adoption of agricultural conservation technologies: Economic and diffusion explanations, Rural Sociology,. 52: 208-220.  
  17. Pannell, D. J.; Marshall, G. R.; Barr, N.; Curtis, A.; Vanclay, F.; & Wilkinson, R. (2006). Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders.  Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture: 1-21.
  18. Saltiel, J. Bauders, J. &  Palakovich, S. (1994). Adoption of sustainable agricultural practices: Diffusion, farm structure and profitability. Rural Sociology, 59: 333-349
  19. Sarisamur, F. & Kilic, S. ( 2011). Potential land use planning and agricultural land suitability. Journal of Physical Science, 10, 2586-2592.
  20. Seevers, B. Graham , D. Gamon,  J & Conklin , N. (1997). Education through cooperative extension. Delmar Publishers, Albany.289pp
  21. Shi-Ming, M., & Sauerborn, J. (2006). Review of history and recent development of organic farming worldwide. Agricultural Science in China, 5: 169- 178.
  22. Souza, D. G . Cyphers, D. M., & Phipps, T. (1993). Factors affecting the adoption of sustainable agriculture practices. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 22(2): 165-170.
  23. Wheeler , S. (2005). Factors influencing agricultural professionals’ attitudes toward organic Agriculture and biotechnology. Center for Regulation and Market Analysis, University of South Australia
  24. Wilson, C. & Tisdell, C. (2001). Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health and sustainability costs. Ecological Economics 3 : 449–462.
  25. Yazdanpanah, M. & Forouzani,  M. (2015). Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to predict Iranian students' intention to purchase organic food. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1-11
  26. Yazdanpanah, M. & Forouzani,  M. (2015). Willingness of Iranian young adults to eat organic foods: Application of the Health Belief Model. Food Quality and Preference. 75-83

Zhao, J.  Luo, Q. Deng, H.  & Yan, Y. (2008). China  Philos  Trans  R Soc Lond  Biol Sci, 1492, 893–904 technologies, Rural Sociology. 48: 308-323.