The economic contribution of forest resources use to rural livelihoods (Case study: Hezar Jarib area of Behshahr City)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Graduate Student, Agricultural Economics, Sari University, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Agricultural conomics, Sari University, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Agricultural Economics, Sari University, Iran

Abstract

Forest resources play an important role in rural livelihoods and wellbeing of hundred millions of people in developing countries. The aim of this study is determining the importance of forest products in rural household’s income and poverty levels and inequality. Economic-Social data of 160 forest fringe households of Hezar Jabir area of Behshahr city were collected using questionnaires and interviews. According to the rural poverty linein 2010 adjusted for survey year (2013), we measure poverty indices in two stages (with and without forest income). For measuring income inequality, Gini coefficient in two staged (with and without forest income) was used. We found that products from environmental resources represent an important component in rural livelihoods. Our analyses indicate that in the study area, income from forest environmental resources occupies the second largest share (%30) in average total household income. Also, by eliminating forest income, the numbers of poor people were been 1.8 times and the distance is greater than the poverty line (4.2 times). Income inequality is 1.28 times, the welfare of the rural population without forest income decrease to the extent of 323.2 million Rials. Poverty and inequality analyses show that incorporating forest environmental incomes in household accounts significantly reduces measured rural poverty and income inequality, beside poverty reduction is the background of environmental sustainability.

Keywords

References

  1. Amirnejad, h.(2006). Natural  Resource  economic.University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources of Sari.Forest publishing ,PP30-31.(In farsi)
  2. Appiah, M., Blay, D., Damnyag, L., Dwomoh, F.K., Pappinen, A., & Luukanen, O. (2009). Dependence on forest resources and tropical deforestation in Ghana. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 11 (3), 471–487.
  3. Asfaw,A., Lemenih,M., Kassa,H., & Ewnetu,Z.( 2013). Importance, determinants and gender dimensions of forest income in eastern highlands of Ethiopia: The case of communities around Jelo Afromontane forest .Forest  Policy and Economics, 28, 1-7.
  4. Babulo, B., Muys, B., Nega, F., Tollens, E., Nyssen, J., Deckers, J., & Mathijs, E.(2009).The economic contribution of forest resource use to rural livelihoods in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 109–117.                                                                            
  5. Cavendish, W. (1999). Poverty, inequality and environmental resources: quantitative analysis of rural households. Working Paper Series 99-9. Center for the study of Africa Economies, Oxford.
  6. Cavendish, W.(2000). Empirical regularities in the poverty-environment relationship of rural households: evidence from Zimbabwe. World Development, 28,1979–2003.
  7. Cavendish, W.(2002). Quantitative methods for estimating the economic value of resource use to rural household. In: Campbell, B. M. Luckert, M.K. (Eds.), Uncovering the hidden harvest:FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization. 2003. State of the World's Forests. FAO, Rome.
  8. Campbell, M.B., & Luckert, K.M.(Eds.).(2002). Uncovering the Hidden Harvest: Valuation Methods for Woodland and Forest Resources. Earthscan Publications Ltd., London.
  9. Economy World newspaper, (2012). Retrieved June23, 2012,from  www.donya-e-eqtesad.com ,( 2678) , pp 8. (In farsi)
  10. Central Bank of Islamic Rebublic of Iran (2003-2013) Consumption Price Index. From http:// www. CBA. ir. (In farsi)
  11. Ellis, F.( 2001).Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. Oxford University Press, New York.
  12. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization.(2003). State of the World's Forests. FAO, Rome.
  13. Fisher, M.(2004).Household welfare and forest dependence in Southern Malawi Environment and Development Economics, 9,135–154.
  14. Jalali, M. , (2006). Decomposition of the Gini coefficient and income elasticity. Professiona and   Scientifi Journal of Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 63(4). (In farsi)
  15. Kamanga, P., Vedeld, P., & Sjaastad, E.(2009).Forest incomes and rural livelihoods in Chiradzulu District, Malawi. Ecological Economics, 68, 613–624.
  16. Koning, F.D. aga, M.A. Bravo, m., & Chiu, M.(2011).Bridging the gap between forest conservation and poverty alleviation: the Ecuadorian Socio Bosque program environmental science & policy, 14, 531–542.
  17. Lingani, P. C. Tigabu, M. Savadogo, P. Oden, P.C., & Ouad, J.M.(2009). Determinants of access to forest products in southern Burkina Faso.    Forest policy and Economics, 11, 516–524.
  18. Mamo, G., Sjaastad, E., & Vedeld, P.(2007). Economic dependence on forest resources: acase from Dendi District, Ethiopia. Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 916–927.
  19. Narain, U., Gupta, S., & van't Veld, K.(2008). Poverty and resource dependence in rural India. Ecological Economics, 66, 161–176.
  20. Nielsen ,M.R., Pouliot,M., & Bakkegaard,R.K.(2012). Combining income and assets measures to include the transitory nature of poverty in assessments of forest dependence: Evidence from the Democratic Republic of Congo. Ecological Economics, 78, 37–46.
  21. Ravallion, M. (1998). “Poverty Lines in Theory and Practice” Paper No.133 LSMS, Working, World Bank.
  22. Rayamajhi,S., Smith-Hall,C., & Helles,F.(2012). Empirical evidence of the economic importance of Central Himalayan forests to rural households. Forest Policy and Economics 20, 25–35.
  23. Reddy, S.R.C., & Chakravarty, S.P.(1999).Forest dependency and income distribution in a subsistence economy: evidence from India. World Development, 27, 1141-1149.
  24. Sen, A.(1976). "Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurment" Econometrica,vol. 44, 219- 231.
  25. Shackleton, C.M., Shackleton, S.E., Buiten, E., & Bird, N.(2007). The importance of dry woodlands and forests in rural livelihoods and poverty alleviation in South Africa. Forest Policy and Economics, 9 (5), 558–577.
  26. Soltani, A., Shamekhi, T., Noori Naieni, M. S., Arabmazar,A.(2010). Effects of forest resources on income distribution and poverty(Case study: watershed of Tang Tamoradi). Journal of jungle and  wood productions, 63(4), 369-385. (In farsi)
  27. Sunderlin, W., angelsen, A., & Wonder, S. (2003). Forests and poverty alleviation, in the State of the World's Forests, Rome: FAO.
  28. Vedeld, P., Angelsen, A., Sjaastad, E., & Berg, G.K.(2004). Counting on the environment: forest incomes and the rural poor. Environ. Econ. Ser. Paper, vol. 98. World Bank Environmental Department.
  29. Vedeld, p., Jumane, A., Wapalila, G., & Songorwa, A.(2012). Protected areas, poverty and conflicts A livelihood case study of Mikumi National Park, Tanzania. Forest Policy and Economics 21, 20–31.
  30. World Bank.(2002). A revised Forest Strategy for the World Bank Group. Washington D.C.:The World Bank.
  31. World Bank.(2004). Sustaining Forests: A Development Strategy. World Bank, Washington D.C, pp 81.
  32. World Bank.(2005). Introduction to poverty Analysis, STATA Manual, J H Revision, World Bank Institute.
  33. World Commission on Environment and Development(WCED). (1987). Our common future, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  34. Yakhkeshi,A.(2006). Integrated management in the North Caspian forests with community participation. Tehran, Mir-moon publishing, Vol 1,PP 18-20. (In farsi)
  35. Yemiru, T., Roos, A., Campbell, B.M., & Bohlin, F.(2010). Forest incomes and poverty alleviation under participatory forestmanagement in the Bale Highlands, Southern Ethiopia. International Forestry Review, 12 (1),66–77.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics